Wednesday, November 16, 2011

U.S.SUPREME COURT AND THE OBAMA HEALTH CARE LAW.

                                           Email me     macgeo2345@hotmail.com
                                        read my blogs    http:/macgeo1234.blogspot.com
    (Note the date this blog was written)

The biggest concern aside from the Unemployment situation is no doubt, the legality of the controversial Obama Healthcare law that goes into effect on January 1st of 2012.
    I heard a news report where they reported the Supreme Court will make a decision as quickly as June of 2012. I guess that all depends on how we interpret the word "quickly" is.
    This is a law that's going to affect literally all of the recipients who are presently on, or are going to soon be on, Medicare. This is a law that's allowing a left leaning, Secondary Ins. Broker to reap the billions of dollars in profit from people who are FORCED to provide their own Secondary insurance whether they like it or not!! (Secondary Ins. provides for paying part of the 20% that Medicare doesn't pay on Medical bills.) That Broker goes by the name of "AARP". Which consequently, allows AARP to donate more of the profit to the great Obama machine for the 2012 General election. Get it??
     The legality of this Bill is flawed according to an Amendment in the Constitution that protects the consumer from being forced to buy any commodities by any Gov't institution. Or something similar to that.
     This is a bill that was "rammed" down our throats by a Democratic Congress who, at the time couldn't even tell the rest of Congress what the particulars were in the Bill. A Bill 2700 pages long that, when eventually was read, couldn't be satisfactorily understood anyway, because of the many conflicting regulations in it. And they did it behind closed doors, barring the Republicans from even participating in the decision due to the "Closed Doors"!!
    Meanwhile,there's a fortune being made by AARP and it's coveted Ins. Co.'s by them advertising that it's definitely going to happen on January 1st, and those who haven't purchased the Secondary Insurance are going to be fined by the Federal Gov't for not doing so. (What a boom that is for the Insurance Companies!) Having admitted he invited AARP to sit down with him to design Obamacare in the first place, he simply invited the Fox to design the henhouse. Isn't that neat???
      All this, even though it's being considered to be, and most likely will be, Unconstitutional. Meaning then, that anyone having been coersed into purchasing the insurance under false pretenses, can demand their money back. Right??
    So because of this being so important to the masses in this country, why isn't the Supreme Court making this a top priority on their schedule? The excuse that they're too busy with other matters doesn't fly with me!! Nothing could be more important to the American people right now than this is.
    So they need to place this matter ahead of anything else that's on their plate.
    Leaving their decision until June only complicates the matter and allows AARP and it's friends to reap the profits of selling more insurance for another six months.
    Do I smell a rat, here? I mean, if it looks like a rat, and smells like a rat, it probably is a rat, right??
    Here's what could happen if it's allowed to go until June; Obama and his allies think that if it is allowed to go into effect on Jan. 1st, and stays in effect for six months, the electorate will have accepted it by then, and it would be too complicated to change it as well. The Supreme  Court could also want to sweep it under the rug, considering the turmoil and confusion it would cause if they reversed it, and the count could then go from 5 to 4 in favor of repeal to 4 to 5 in favor of repeal. Obama wins!!!
    Will the law be suspended until June by the Supreme Court? Why wouldn't they, and why haven't they? And why hasn't the congress put a blocker on this onslaught of sales by AARP and their friends?
    Just Askin'.

1 comment: