BENGHAZI MURDERS: HOW AMATEURISH IS IT FOR HILARY TO THINK SHE CAN ASSUME RESPONSIBILITY FOR IT?

     How important does she really think she is, and how dumb does she think we are that we would let her get away with it?
     It's obvious now that Hilary Clinton has allowed her narcissism to outgrow her common sense. Why? Because anyone with any sense of authority knows that an appointed officer of any Corporation or business, can only accept BLAME. But not RESPONSIBILITY. Responsibility in government as well can only be designated to an Elected Official such as a President. In this case, the President of the United States, Barack Hussein Obama. After that, it's blame.
     For her to think she is so important means that she has only elected herself to do it, and to be honest with her, that really doesn't count, as much as she would like to think it does.
     When the top gun in any organization is elected, only then are they entrusted with responsibility.
     The owner or owners are the ones who ultimately suffer the expense when anything goes wrong. Of course that only makes sense, when you realize the profit and loss lies directly at their footsteps.
     Too often during the Obama Administration's reign has someone attempted to take the responsibility with the saying, "The buck stops with me." But not Barack!
     No, it does not stop with her! It stops with the elected person who designated the appointed person to get the job done. Just ask any management consultant, or even better, Richard M Nixon.
     At the beginning of the Watergate scandal, he really had no knowledge of the planned break-in that ultimately resulted in his demise. It was planned and executed before he realized what they had done. This of course came to light and to his surprise in the News media.
     His mistake was, when finding out, attempting to cover it up, and he was caught doing that. A Cardinal sin when a Republican does something like that, but just an every day occurrence that is shrugged off by the slippery Liberal Media when such a thing is committed by the Socialists.
     But at least he was a good enough man to step forward at the end and assume RESPONSIBILITY for his deed. He was right in saying he had no knowledge of it happening, but was decent enough to recognize he was still responsible.
     For Barack Obama, this is where the true measure of a man comes into play. Where the honest men get separated from the devious boys, and he is not an honorable enough man to do it and resign. Even if he assumes responsibility, he doesn't have the guts to step down in shame over the murders of four honest and dedicated men he placed in danger and then abandoned in their repeated pleas for help.
     A man not loyal to the nation, not saddled with empathy, a man without guilt in what he denies, and not a man raised in this country or taught in it's Constitutional values. Shame on you, Barack Obama!!
     You Liberals who stand behind him are just as guilty as he is, including Hilary Clinton who thought she could silence the curiosity of the American People with such an obviously cheap trick as not accepting the BLAME and accepting the responsibility without consequences.
     Please vote for Mitt Romney.    Just askin'.