ARE WE "TELEGRAPHING" INFORMATION TO THE TERRORISTS THAT WE SHOULDN'T?

     Watching Fox News this morning, a peculiarity was pointed out on Bill Hemmer's show that caught my fancy.
     One of the guests pointed out the observation that the Obama administration was revealing "too much detail" in the methods being used to keep track of the offenders of our great Country, namely "the Islamic Al Qaida Terrorists."
     Now this is strange, since we had to find out by means of a whistle blower  that we were indeed being tracked by the Administration ourselves, in our own private lives.
     In a previous blog, I described the way I thought it was wrong for some of the Fox News hosts to cleverly "coach" the opposition, although acting unaware of the fact they were doing so! E.G.: "What the Liberals said was wrong, they should have said it this way." and they say it, or, "They did it wrong! They should have done it this way"
     It's referred to as "telegraphing" a message. ( I suppose if we examine ourselves a little closer, we would see that we all innocently do it.)
     However, I wonder sometimes, since these people are all professionally trained to avoid this kind of thing, (Or should have been!) if we should just pass it off as "innocence". What do you think?
     In the case of the traitor and Muslim Terrorist Nidal Malik Hasan, the Fort hood slaughterer accused of shooting a total of 51 American soldiers in 2009, on trial as we write, the Justice Dept. charged  him with "Workplace Violence" instead of "an act of war".
     In so doing, he is allowed to defend himself in a public trial and portray himself as a "Martyr" to every member of "The Muslim Brotherhood" and inspire them to rise up and fight, as well. They will now have a "Saint" in the "Kingdom of Islam"  
     Just more devious thinking on the part of the defender of "The Muslim Brotherhood," Barack Hussein Obama, right?
     Did I say that right or am I just confusing everybody? Just sayin'.