THERES A DIFFERENCE BETWEEN "COMPROMISING" IN WHAT THE BIBLE MEANS TO SAY,

     And what we determine it means. That would make sense because that sort of "Compromise" would still be within the confines of believing that God still exists, regardless of the settlement between differing beliefs.
     But "compromising" anything that would take us away from the Main cornerstone of our Free Society, the Bill of Rights and the Constitution of the United States, would be inching us away from the very strength it affords the common man it was meant for.
     With the "Progressive Party" (A revived name taken from the "Communist Party of America that existed in the 1920's and in the midst of it's failing, changed it's name to "The Progressive party" in desperation, but failed anyway.) Now they've dragged it up once again, in order to hide the embarrassment the Socialist "Democrats" have caused by following Obama in a "Different Direction".
     A direction that takes us away from the influence of God entirely.
     It is, in it's entirety, made of groups of people who have devised different theories for different individual purposes. All of which have a different common core consisting specifically of the "Absence of God".
     It's a totally different concept of corrupted science in which they have come to the conclusion their purpose of domination is better suited without the inclusion of God.
     In fact, by eliminating the theory of  Godly existence, they have given themselves the privilege of asserting themselves above us and the reach of God by setting him aside without the fear of consequence.
     For them to expect us to "Compromise" away from the inclusion of God, would be like mixing oil with water, and if you ever tried it, you will know it doesn't work.
     Along with this belief of theirs, they seem to feel that their "Line of Least Resistance" approach is more suitable to them in leading everyone else, whether we like it or not, in a "Different Direction" as Barack so often repeats.
     A Christian Pastor, Andy Stanley of the Atlanta Mega Church of North Point Ministries, I believe is a bit confused in his thinking. He remarked, "Serving the people we don't see eye to eye with, is the essence of Christianity". "Jesus did it for a world he didn't agree with. If a bakery doesn't want to sell a product to a Gay couple, it's their business, literally. But leave Jesus out of it".
     I say 'that' itself, is a conundrum! If the baker truly believed in God, he should have said, " even though you don't believe in Jesus or God, Jesus would have still given you a loaf of bread knowing you as a sinner, so do I recognize you as such. Take it and go with God's blessings."
 But you must consider this; If those same Gay people who are presumably Atheists, were in control of our destiny as they presume they are now under Barack Obama's rule, they would insist, (As they're currently doing.) we leave God out of our lives to satisfy their tastes, and not ours. 
      "Compromising" in that case, is not the answer.    Just, sayin'.