Saturday, April 5, 2014

GET THIS, FOLKS WHO DON'T KNOW; THE DIRECTOR OF THE CIA, IS A CONFIRMED MEMBER OF THE "MUSLIM BROTHERHOOD"


    
     I heard this some time ago from another reliable source, and now I'm sure of it. ; It has now been confirmed that Jon Brennan is a convert to Islam and is a confirmed member of "the Muslim Brotherhood". A definite "Oxymoron" considering he is the Director of the CIA. (Central Intelligence Agency)
     It's an indication to me, that the Benghazi incident was a co-ordinated attack on the American Embassy in Libya, and the reason why there was a cover-up for the slaughtering of the Ambassador to Libya, Christopher Stephens. ( Along with 3 Patriotic defenders who sacrificed their lives protecting him.)
     Now consider this; We now have the proof  that The Obama Administration has been supplying arms to Al Qaida ever since the rebellion started in Libya, both without our prior knowledge and now, with it. Al Qaida is a major part of the Rebels both in Libya and also Syria.
     It was Al Qaida who was involved in that attack in Benghazi. Al Qaida is the Muslim World mobile fighting force of "The Muslim Brotherhood".
     Is it possible that Ambassador Stephens found out something the Administration didn't want him to know in one of those arms exchanges? Just a question, of course!
     So how could anyone in their right mind not be concerned with those events?
     There's a built-in dependence within the "Progressive" Party that I feel is a crutch they seem to often employ; They are reflecting back on history, and the habits of the common man to have a short memory of the facts of the past. And as such, are hoping now with all their might, their misdeeds will be forgotten by the time it comes to the next election.
     But how much deception and wrong can be done to a Proud Nation of Good people with a past of  great resilience in the event of hard times over a period of 250 years? Particularly right now, in a time where we have been fooled by the "Joker" time after time, after time, and in such a short period of time in our history?
     Right down to them Going back in history and eliminating true, but negative facts about the biographies and autobiographies of tyrants in their Administration, to show they were everything good, but erasing the bad.
     It happens after you've read biographic facts about their personal misdeeds of the past on the Internet, only to find those facts are non-existent now.
     Often now, I can refer back to those original facts of two years ago, only to find they have been eliminated and replaced with glorious revelations of their achievements instead. E.G. ; The infamous Gyorgy Schwartz. (Alias George Soros). Go to the Internet and you'll find him to be the "Accomplished" George Soros. With all the sinister facts showing he and his father as non-practicing Jews in Hungary being paid by the Nazis to deliver notices to the other Jews in their neighborhood to report to the German officials circa 1934. George Soros was known to state when questioned by a reporter, "It was for the money, and money is Power!"
     By so doing in the changing of the story, a student of history is led to believe not the true facts, but the adjusted knowledge of someone who has the power to convince you to believe what they, the perpetrators wish them to believe. How fair is that?
     What it does to me is, they have slowly but surely taken control of the Internet and I can't really depend on what they're telling me, anymore.
     So should the U.S. Gov't. really be able to seize that kind of control to do with as they wish?? Should they really be allowed to turn over control of the Internet to the rest of the World so they can then manipulate it to suit their own means for time Immemorial?  Especially when the fantasies of the "Progressive" Idealists (Communists) are proving to us they can't be trusted to handle the Nation's affairs without robbing our Country blind in the first, second and third place?
     You tell me!! As I've stated several times before, "Beware the wolf in sheep's clothing!" Just sayin'.
    

1 comment: