MAKE IT CLEAR! THE "PROGRESSIVES" OF TODAY ARE "NOT" THE "DEMOCRATIC" PARTY OF CONSTITUTIONAL YESTERDAY!

     It would be utterly disastrous and unchangeable, should the Democrats of Yesteryear follow the old adage of "Like Father, Like Son" and follow that rule this election year! Why?? Because, believe it or not, there truthfully is no comparison between the Democrats of Yesteryear and the "Progressives" of today. It's very dangerous not to recognize it!!
     In fact, there will be no more Yesteryear if the "Progressives" have any further say in the "New direction" in which they're intending to "steer" us on, by Hillary Clinton! That direction will be in 2 parts; Away from the once-existing Constitutional Process we've all enjoyed, to the "Don't do as I do, but do as I say!!" and the denial of our once Sacred Constitutional Rights if we object.
     Make no mistake about it! There will be 2 sets of systems evolving from the present "Gov't of the People, by the People and For the People", and the "Progressive"s sole use of the Constitutional Rights to go by, to protect their misdeeds as they please.  (They, against us as not entitled when we as the"People", are objectionable.)
     A good example of it as professed by the Obama Regime, is in the hearings that constantly take place by the Republican controlled Congress while investigating the un-Constitutional antics of those "Progressives", in which they betray the American People almost daily and then use their Constitutional 5th Amendment to protect themselves, while not having to admit to their betrayal  when allowing the rest of the World in this case, access to our most coveted Security documents!
     I point to the revealing of our most secretive information on our Country's Security by Barack Obama, by way of Hillary Clinton's Emails.
     How could we possibly exempt the President of the United States from knowing exactly what Hillary was doing any minute of any day, when in fact, her job is to do exactly and promptly every task he has put upon her?? Especially when it comes to National Security and there is virtually no other "level of command" position between him and her?
     Which brings me to another point; "The Peter Principal" chain of command that most all large companies use effectively, is to be sure that all significant moves either trivial or important be reported to the highest Supervisor of  it's operation, and orders be initiated in accordance with their importance for the next in Command until it reaches it's required, intended goal. Barack Obama being the highest Supervisor in this case, would then be principally responsible.
     What does "Responsibility" really mean, when damage of any kind occurs as a result of  that consequential action? Well it's not just ended with the highest Supervisor saying, "I accept all Responsibility!' and just ending there, but just and appropriate punishment needs to ensue. NOT SO WITH THIS REGIME!!! The crime goes unpunished regardless of the severity of the offense! No one gets punished!
     Does that satisfy your appetite for correction? NOT MINE!!  Jut sayin'.