WHY DON'T THE CONGRESSMEN QUESTIONING JOHN KERRY QUERY HIS DISHONEST TESTIMONY IN THE PAST?

     
     Does "having a short memory " apply to Congress in the present questioning of John Kerry? I ask this question, because I distinctly remember John Kerry giving false information before a Grand Jury, presumably under Oath, concerning his witnessing the Wah Mee massacre in Viet Nam.
     It was proven that at the time, he could not have been an eye witness to the incident, since other Viet Nam veterans testified he was somewhere else entirely. Wasn't that a Federal felony?
     He was somehow granted a pass on that one. But in this important manner of attacking Syria as I write, and him being used as a pawn to speak for President Obama in the case, why on earth aren't they publicly presenting his potential to not tell the truth now?
     He, as well as Hillary Clinton, have both committed those felonies in the past, and everybody is aware of it.
     Is Barack Obama and his phony Regime so powerful, that they can convince present day politicians to not bring it up?
     Come on!! Get some guts, Congressmen!!
     It would be nothing short of a crime to take this man's disreputable testimony in order to go to war at such a volatile time, such as it is! Just Sayin'.