email me macgeo2345@hotmail.com
read my blogs http:/macgeo1234.blogspot.com
As we watch the race for Republican Presidential Candidate, we are tending to ignore the main reason the Democrat/Socialists may get back into power.
Rampant, voter fraud! As it stands right now, they don't have a ghost of a chance if it becomes an honest election. They know it! So if the Socialists and the Main Media can keep up the slanderous campaign remarks towards the Republican Candidates and highlight anything other than the investigation into voter fraud, it's to their advantage. They definitely can't afford to suffer the loss of the fraudulent votes. My own contention is that, if you could nullify the fraudulent votes of the past elections, the Democratic/Socialists wouldn't have gotten where they are now!
Obama and his Administration along with his backers are desperate to get another 4 years, not because of the economy, but because of the irregularities and the money "disappearances" of the last four. The investigations can be averted or at least delayed if they get re-elected. Their next move will probably be to announce a blanket amnesty in order to legalize the Illegal's votes.
In the past, they have had organizations such as the infamous "Acorn" and several others, encourage mass amounts of illegal aliens and citizens with criminal records to register to vote. This is why they are so dead against the voters being required to produce proper I.D. when voting.
The Democratic/Socialist base consists of several groups of people, The manipulative rich who benefit from large Gov't such as Billionaire George Soros, an Atheist who primarily makes his money on inside trader information leaked to him by his Congress friends, the Occupy Protesters who never earned their way in the first place, the felons who don't qualify to vote and the non residents working in this country whether legally or illegally. As it is right now, any of them could walk in off the street, demand to vote without producing any means of I.D. and most precincts will allow it if the pollsters don't insist on it. Sincerity is a word that's absent from their vocabulary.
I see them being the largest threat to our freedom. A true Democracy can only work if it's honest.
Just sayin'.
Thursday, December 29, 2011
Sunday, December 25, 2011
I DID A LITTLE MORE RESEARCH AND,,, MERRY CHRISTMAS!!!!
email me macgeo2345@hotmail.com
read my blogs http:/macgeo1234.blogspot.com
or George McNaughton@George McNaughto on Twitter
The other day, I got tired of watching all this baloney on the T.V. about moratoriums and rulings prohibiting Christmas displays in public places. It encouraged me to do some research on the amount of Christians there are in this world of 6 billion people as against the amount of Atheists.
It turns out there are 2.2 billion Christians of one sort or another who celebrate the birth of Christ and a measly 72 million Atheists that don't. There are some groups of people such as the Jehovah's Witnesses who look at celebrations as pagan rituals and do not celebrate them. But they are not Atheists in the sense of despising the thought of Jesus Christ or God. They still believe that God exists and Jesus was born the son of God.That's certainly their perogative as to how they want to honor him. It doesn't mean they don't respect the Christians that do. They just don't celebrate in a Paganistic way. I won't count them either way. therefore that makes it 320 Christians to 1 Atheist. So............... Should a town of 320 put up with complaints of 1 Atheist not liking Christmas, and not put up a Nativity scene? NO!!! Which brings me to the next question.
Should Atheist judges only be allowed on the benches to the same % of population? I think that would be a fair and excellent idea!!! Think about that while we go to bed on Christmas eve. (While the Atheist hipocrates spend Christmas day gloating over the profits their companies brought in because of Christmas sales?) ZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZ.
When I wake up on the morning of December 25th, the first thing will be to thank God I did! Because it'll be Christmas!
There will be many Christians waking up that morning the same way. They'll be happily counting their blessings, wishing others "Merry Christmas," opening presents, some of which we never expected to receive, and forgiving those who may have offended them in one way or another in the past year.
Watching the children express their joy in the bountiful things they'll receive from others including Santa Clause, will always be a pleasurable moment.
Sometimes, just the words "Merry Christmas, I love you" are more than enough. It is for me as I meet the break of Dawn. But far more than that happened last beautiful Christmas morning. Expecting my daughter and son-in law to arrive that night to spend the special night with us, my wife found there were a few things needed for her baking. Realizing that Safeway was open for a few hours, she headed down there. She gathered the things she needed and approached the cashier who gleefully announced, "Congratulations, You are the recipient of $40.00 free groceries from an anonymous donor," Marilyn was totally surprised and pleased.
A woman who wished to remain unknown was paying for customers at random. The clerk explained she does it every year. My wife looked around, hoping to find her, but the service desk lady told her she wasn't in the store.
A humble and thankful gesture indeed. There's nothing wrong if us humans, with faith in God, create some of our own miracles, is there??
A premature, Merry Christmas to all, and by the way, Please don't watch the New Years celebrations that don't honor Auld Lang Syne!!! It's another Atheist attempt to dullen the great feeling we get when we all sing it. Belt it out, folks! It's a beautiful love song! Just sayin'.
read my blogs http:/macgeo1234.blogspot.com
or George McNaughton@George McNaughto on Twitter
The other day, I got tired of watching all this baloney on the T.V. about moratoriums and rulings prohibiting Christmas displays in public places. It encouraged me to do some research on the amount of Christians there are in this world of 6 billion people as against the amount of Atheists.
It turns out there are 2.2 billion Christians of one sort or another who celebrate the birth of Christ and a measly 72 million Atheists that don't. There are some groups of people such as the Jehovah's Witnesses who look at celebrations as pagan rituals and do not celebrate them. But they are not Atheists in the sense of despising the thought of Jesus Christ or God. They still believe that God exists and Jesus was born the son of God.That's certainly their perogative as to how they want to honor him. It doesn't mean they don't respect the Christians that do. They just don't celebrate in a Paganistic way. I won't count them either way. therefore that makes it 320 Christians to 1 Atheist. So............... Should a town of 320 put up with complaints of 1 Atheist not liking Christmas, and not put up a Nativity scene? NO!!! Which brings me to the next question.
Should Atheist judges only be allowed on the benches to the same % of population? I think that would be a fair and excellent idea!!! Think about that while we go to bed on Christmas eve. (While the Atheist hipocrates spend Christmas day gloating over the profits their companies brought in because of Christmas sales?) ZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZ.
When I wake up on the morning of December 25th, the first thing will be to thank God I did! Because it'll be Christmas!
There will be many Christians waking up that morning the same way. They'll be happily counting their blessings, wishing others "Merry Christmas," opening presents, some of which we never expected to receive, and forgiving those who may have offended them in one way or another in the past year.
Watching the children express their joy in the bountiful things they'll receive from others including Santa Clause, will always be a pleasurable moment.
Sometimes, just the words "Merry Christmas, I love you" are more than enough. It is for me as I meet the break of Dawn. But far more than that happened last beautiful Christmas morning. Expecting my daughter and son-in law to arrive that night to spend the special night with us, my wife found there were a few things needed for her baking. Realizing that Safeway was open for a few hours, she headed down there. She gathered the things she needed and approached the cashier who gleefully announced, "Congratulations, You are the recipient of $40.00 free groceries from an anonymous donor," Marilyn was totally surprised and pleased.
A woman who wished to remain unknown was paying for customers at random. The clerk explained she does it every year. My wife looked around, hoping to find her, but the service desk lady told her she wasn't in the store.
A humble and thankful gesture indeed. There's nothing wrong if us humans, with faith in God, create some of our own miracles, is there??
A premature, Merry Christmas to all, and by the way, Please don't watch the New Years celebrations that don't honor Auld Lang Syne!!! It's another Atheist attempt to dullen the great feeling we get when we all sing it. Belt it out, folks! It's a beautiful love song! Just sayin'.
Wednesday, December 21, 2011
WHERE IS ALL THE MONEY THAT DISAPPEARED? NO PAPER TRAIL?
email me maqcgeo2345@hotmail.com
Read my blogs http:/macgeo1234.blogspot.com
Where did all the money go from the "Fast and Furious" debacle?
Where did all the money go from the "Solyndra" solar panel scandal?
Where did all the money from the "MF Global" scandal go?
Why are we asking Obama's appointees?
It sure is all shrouded in mystery, isn't it? Gee!! Are there any loyal supporters of Obama and his "Chicago Cronies" who know where the money went? C'mon, loyal Diehards, You must know! Do you believe they're telling the truth when they say, "I don't know!"? Everybody's asking everyone in astonishing bewilderment, "Where did it go"??
Through all of this, NOBODY"S ASKING THE PRESIDENT OF THE UNITED STATES WHERE IT WENT!!! Or maybe we should ask the the head of the IRS! Tim Geithner has just hired !6,000 additional accountants. Shouldn't they be able to find it? Shouldn't there be some income tax on that money? Huh???? Money is made up of molecules, It can't disappear!!
Anyone who's ever been involved in a management course learns that, although someone within the Organization is to blame, it's the man or woman that runs the whole show who is ultimately responsible! No matter what the reason or excuse is, the person at the top is responsible.
Did the White house run out of paper? Did all the computers shut down? Or was Barack Obama too busy flying around in his "very expensive"airplane bargaining for more money to add to his re-election campaign? Maybe we can ask God's"Ultimate" Accountant when he greets us in Heaven, or you Socialists can ask him directly if you see him in Hell!! One thing I'm convinced of, there's nothing heavenly about this President. Just sayin'.
Read my blogs http:/macgeo1234.blogspot.com
Where did all the money go from the "Fast and Furious" debacle?
Where did all the money go from the "Solyndra" solar panel scandal?
Where did all the money from the "MF Global" scandal go?
Why are we asking Obama's appointees?
It sure is all shrouded in mystery, isn't it? Gee!! Are there any loyal supporters of Obama and his "Chicago Cronies" who know where the money went? C'mon, loyal Diehards, You must know! Do you believe they're telling the truth when they say, "I don't know!"? Everybody's asking everyone in astonishing bewilderment, "Where did it go"??
Through all of this, NOBODY"S ASKING THE PRESIDENT OF THE UNITED STATES WHERE IT WENT!!! Or maybe we should ask the the head of the IRS! Tim Geithner has just hired !6,000 additional accountants. Shouldn't they be able to find it? Shouldn't there be some income tax on that money? Huh???? Money is made up of molecules, It can't disappear!!
Anyone who's ever been involved in a management course learns that, although someone within the Organization is to blame, it's the man or woman that runs the whole show who is ultimately responsible! No matter what the reason or excuse is, the person at the top is responsible.
Did the White house run out of paper? Did all the computers shut down? Or was Barack Obama too busy flying around in his "very expensive"airplane bargaining for more money to add to his re-election campaign? Maybe we can ask God's"Ultimate" Accountant when he greets us in Heaven, or you Socialists can ask him directly if you see him in Hell!! One thing I'm convinced of, there's nothing heavenly about this President. Just sayin'.
Tuesday, December 20, 2011
POOR NEWT, IN MORE WAYS THAN ONE! IS HE WRONG, THOUGH?
email me macgeo2345@hotmail.com
Read my blogs http:/macgeo1234.blogspot.com
I've been watching the news this morning concerning the drop in the polls for Newt Gingrich. Some of the Conservative Critics are making it look like his comments are over the top and radical. He expressed how he would change the Judicial system in order to remind some of those Judges who would flagrantly ignore the Constitution and Bill of rights in their blockages and adverse rulings. These rulings being done in favor of the Judge's personal desires and/or the desires of the Special Interest groups who probably placed him in office. I'm sure we all agree that the Constitution is our guide to honest and fair judgement for all. Right? RIGHT?? (Well, I don't hear any channels changing so far!)
In his defense of expressing his idea of having some reasonable avenue of limited control isn't necessarily a bad idea, since it would have to go through the Congress to be enacted anyway. As it is, there is no provision for correcting their misgivings. Shouldn't we have one?
So, what's every body afraid of then?
I'll bet we would all be astounded at the amount of money that is laid to waste by the decisions that are brought on by those particular judges, having totally ignored the clear intentions of our Sacred Guide.
The EPA is the greatest recipient of those decisions, and aren't you tired of their boring contentions of the past 50 years that the earth is warming up? Even when they never have to prove it is, but only having to say it is the human race that's causing it? We're watching them get foolishly rich from it with this "Green" thing they've switched to now that "Global Warming" has worn itself out. But not before Al Gore became a Billionaire from it. Look it up! Do I need to point out what Obama is doing in that regard? If you have the courage to listen to Fox News, it will startle the hell out of you!
Yet, Newt is being chastised for expressing a notion it needs to be corrected. Is there something wrong with this picture?? Yes, there is. The real reason he's being criticized is because Newt has limited funds in this campaign in order to fight back, and his main Adversary, Mitt Romney, has unlimited funds. The dirty part of Capitalism is, "He with the most money wins".
Let's face it folks. The decisions and blockages by these same Jurists are more commonly made in the interest of politics and money, than the true reasons for the Constitution being abided by.
Right at this very moment, we are shivering in fear that the Supreme Court will rule in favor of Obamacare, even though it's been made glaringly obvious that it intrudes on our privacy and Constitutional rights. If it passes, it will be purely political. If they compromise, it still will be. If it doesn't pass, it will prove to us our Constitution is still intact and working.
I believe that if Jesus had been a man of material wealth, he would have been standing on that hill and, instead of hanging from the cross, would have been saying to Peter, "Peter my man, I can see our churches from here"!! All the while distributing his wealth among the poor people in his flock instead of somebody else's. Believe me, Barack Obama is no copy of Jesus, and he won't be distributing his personal wealth amongst you Barack believers any time soon either. Think you might SAVE some of your own?? Hee! hee! hee!
It was all about money then, and it's all about money now! Give 'em Hell, Newt. Just sayin'.
Read my blogs http:/macgeo1234.blogspot.com
I've been watching the news this morning concerning the drop in the polls for Newt Gingrich. Some of the Conservative Critics are making it look like his comments are over the top and radical. He expressed how he would change the Judicial system in order to remind some of those Judges who would flagrantly ignore the Constitution and Bill of rights in their blockages and adverse rulings. These rulings being done in favor of the Judge's personal desires and/or the desires of the Special Interest groups who probably placed him in office. I'm sure we all agree that the Constitution is our guide to honest and fair judgement for all. Right? RIGHT?? (Well, I don't hear any channels changing so far!)
In his defense of expressing his idea of having some reasonable avenue of limited control isn't necessarily a bad idea, since it would have to go through the Congress to be enacted anyway. As it is, there is no provision for correcting their misgivings. Shouldn't we have one?
So, what's every body afraid of then?
I'll bet we would all be astounded at the amount of money that is laid to waste by the decisions that are brought on by those particular judges, having totally ignored the clear intentions of our Sacred Guide.
The EPA is the greatest recipient of those decisions, and aren't you tired of their boring contentions of the past 50 years that the earth is warming up? Even when they never have to prove it is, but only having to say it is the human race that's causing it? We're watching them get foolishly rich from it with this "Green" thing they've switched to now that "Global Warming" has worn itself out. But not before Al Gore became a Billionaire from it. Look it up! Do I need to point out what Obama is doing in that regard? If you have the courage to listen to Fox News, it will startle the hell out of you!
Yet, Newt is being chastised for expressing a notion it needs to be corrected. Is there something wrong with this picture?? Yes, there is. The real reason he's being criticized is because Newt has limited funds in this campaign in order to fight back, and his main Adversary, Mitt Romney, has unlimited funds. The dirty part of Capitalism is, "He with the most money wins".
Let's face it folks. The decisions and blockages by these same Jurists are more commonly made in the interest of politics and money, than the true reasons for the Constitution being abided by.
Right at this very moment, we are shivering in fear that the Supreme Court will rule in favor of Obamacare, even though it's been made glaringly obvious that it intrudes on our privacy and Constitutional rights. If it passes, it will be purely political. If they compromise, it still will be. If it doesn't pass, it will prove to us our Constitution is still intact and working.
I believe that if Jesus had been a man of material wealth, he would have been standing on that hill and, instead of hanging from the cross, would have been saying to Peter, "Peter my man, I can see our churches from here"!! All the while distributing his wealth among the poor people in his flock instead of somebody else's. Believe me, Barack Obama is no copy of Jesus, and he won't be distributing his personal wealth amongst you Barack believers any time soon either. Think you might SAVE some of your own?? Hee! hee! hee!
It was all about money then, and it's all about money now! Give 'em Hell, Newt. Just sayin'.
Monday, December 19, 2011
THE "I WANT TO BE PRESIDENT" SYNDROME CLOUDS THE REAL REASON WE NEED ONE.
email me macgeo2345@hotmail.com
read my blogs http:/macgeo1234.blogspot.com
In watching the Republican Presidential Candidate debates, It's coming to me that some of the candidates are straying away from what the true problems are for this country, to what it will take to get the nomination. In so doing, they appear to be dropping the emphasis on the very documents that have kept this country on an acceptable path for all of us to follow for the past 2 plus centuries.
Some of the levels of of the State and Federal Judges including the Supreme Courts, have already forgotten or ignored those two documents for the sake of preferred politics, from local Municipalities to the highest in the land. From what I can see, there seems to be no clear system of correcting those damaging and costly, sometimes anti electorate decisions that are glaringly ignorant of the Constitution and the Bill of Rights.
The rules of the two sacred documents are there, obvious and clear. However, the line of least resistance too readily tends to allow them to wander from it. It causes them to come under the eye of the very Organizations the two documents were established to defend us against.
Having pointed that out, I also would like to project my reasons for aligning the candidates as I see them now.
Michelle Bachmann at this time is a favorite of the Tea Party, and has all the sincerity worthy of a President. The fault is not her, but she is brutally honest to a political fault. In her honesty she is and will be, a target of the less than honest news media and pundits who will portray her as something she isn't and present her with twisted and dishonest implications. She has emotions that may cause her to step back for the sake of her and her family's health and mental welfare. Having been the son of a mother of eleven "father absent" children, I admire her greatly for the way her and her husband have raised and nurtured 28 children. God bless you, Michelle, and for the sake of truth, you're a hero in any family's eyes. Also she may be seen as a threat to the "Old boy" Republican Insiders who aren't particularly in love with the change the Tea Party might bring. The "nose out of joint" kind of thing.
Rick Perry is a product of the "Old party" way of "Charm them" with phony smiles and remarks that don't qualify for the level of smarts that are required to be President. Claiming to have grown up with the common folks might have made him a good quarterback, that's all. He only knows the Constitution because it's there. I'm not sure it means that much to him otherwise, as he grasps for straws to stay in the race. He has also displayed his approval of free education for Illegal Immigrants.
The free education for illegal Immigrants has been saddled onto the backs of the normal resident students by raising their tuition costs. No one knows that more than the college heads themselves.
Mitt Romney has great aspirations, is a good speaker, but has damaged his support because of his Mormon background that hasn't allowed him to cater to the other Religious factions of the country, in particular the Southern Baptists. I believe that's the reason his numbers are solid but not enough for him to pull ahead of the % points he now has. I personally think he's been too much "all over the map" in his political exploits of the past which, in all of his sincerity now, is going to hold him back. I think though, that he would be a good President in the respect of proper business management. But the Southern Block will deny him the opportunity of advancing. His two major weaknesses are #1, He won't commit himself to physical toughness if need be, should Iran or North Korea become a serious threat. #2, He refuses to denounce Obama as the Socialist that he obviously is. I found that interesting to say the least because regardless, Obama will call him much worse than that no matter what.
Newt Gingrich appears to me to be the best viable candidate so far, and if no one else more capable of beating Barack Obama arrives on the scene, he will dominate in any debate with Barack Obama. That is, if Barack Obama participates in any debate. He hasn't participated directly in any serious talks or interviews concerning his Presidential responsibilities so far. When confronted with any of the Country's plights where decisions need to be made, he boards Air Force One for another extended vacation, leaving his Crony Socialists to carry the torch. He could very well continue to run his campaign from Air Force One, avoiding confrontations with any competent Adversary. It's all that's kept him in office up until now, while he concentrates on his dream of becoming the leader of the modern world. He's counting fully on the self centered Main media and his army of Community Organizers to pull him through this one. He avoids any chance of being confronted.
Newt Gingrich, even with all his "So called" Baggage, is the man who could bring him down regardless of what he does, apart from Donald Duck and Mickey Mouse getting in on the voting process. The only thing that could hold Newt back at this point in the race, is his need for the almighty dollar to back him. If he can muster that, he'll most likely win.
Newt Gingrich is a true believer in the Constitution, knows it, believes in standing by it and is willing to pursue the life time appointments of Judges to elected term limits. He is dedicated and honest in his proposals for sticking to our original, Democratic Republic way of life.
Let's not forget Ron Paul! I first thought he made sense but as the race goes on, he is portraying himself as an extreme nut. He can do nothing but harm in this affair, including throwing the unseating of Obama under the bus by tossing his zany hat in the ring as an Independent, thereby pulling votes away mainly from the chosen Republican Candidate.
His brains have yet to shift from where they are, back up to his brain. Just sayin'.
read my blogs http:/macgeo1234.blogspot.com
In watching the Republican Presidential Candidate debates, It's coming to me that some of the candidates are straying away from what the true problems are for this country, to what it will take to get the nomination. In so doing, they appear to be dropping the emphasis on the very documents that have kept this country on an acceptable path for all of us to follow for the past 2 plus centuries.
Some of the levels of of the State and Federal Judges including the Supreme Courts, have already forgotten or ignored those two documents for the sake of preferred politics, from local Municipalities to the highest in the land. From what I can see, there seems to be no clear system of correcting those damaging and costly, sometimes anti electorate decisions that are glaringly ignorant of the Constitution and the Bill of Rights.
The rules of the two sacred documents are there, obvious and clear. However, the line of least resistance too readily tends to allow them to wander from it. It causes them to come under the eye of the very Organizations the two documents were established to defend us against.
Having pointed that out, I also would like to project my reasons for aligning the candidates as I see them now.
Michelle Bachmann at this time is a favorite of the Tea Party, and has all the sincerity worthy of a President. The fault is not her, but she is brutally honest to a political fault. In her honesty she is and will be, a target of the less than honest news media and pundits who will portray her as something she isn't and present her with twisted and dishonest implications. She has emotions that may cause her to step back for the sake of her and her family's health and mental welfare. Having been the son of a mother of eleven "father absent" children, I admire her greatly for the way her and her husband have raised and nurtured 28 children. God bless you, Michelle, and for the sake of truth, you're a hero in any family's eyes. Also she may be seen as a threat to the "Old boy" Republican Insiders who aren't particularly in love with the change the Tea Party might bring. The "nose out of joint" kind of thing.
Rick Perry is a product of the "Old party" way of "Charm them" with phony smiles and remarks that don't qualify for the level of smarts that are required to be President. Claiming to have grown up with the common folks might have made him a good quarterback, that's all. He only knows the Constitution because it's there. I'm not sure it means that much to him otherwise, as he grasps for straws to stay in the race. He has also displayed his approval of free education for Illegal Immigrants.
The free education for illegal Immigrants has been saddled onto the backs of the normal resident students by raising their tuition costs. No one knows that more than the college heads themselves.
Mitt Romney has great aspirations, is a good speaker, but has damaged his support because of his Mormon background that hasn't allowed him to cater to the other Religious factions of the country, in particular the Southern Baptists. I believe that's the reason his numbers are solid but not enough for him to pull ahead of the % points he now has. I personally think he's been too much "all over the map" in his political exploits of the past which, in all of his sincerity now, is going to hold him back. I think though, that he would be a good President in the respect of proper business management. But the Southern Block will deny him the opportunity of advancing. His two major weaknesses are #1, He won't commit himself to physical toughness if need be, should Iran or North Korea become a serious threat. #2, He refuses to denounce Obama as the Socialist that he obviously is. I found that interesting to say the least because regardless, Obama will call him much worse than that no matter what.
Newt Gingrich appears to me to be the best viable candidate so far, and if no one else more capable of beating Barack Obama arrives on the scene, he will dominate in any debate with Barack Obama. That is, if Barack Obama participates in any debate. He hasn't participated directly in any serious talks or interviews concerning his Presidential responsibilities so far. When confronted with any of the Country's plights where decisions need to be made, he boards Air Force One for another extended vacation, leaving his Crony Socialists to carry the torch. He could very well continue to run his campaign from Air Force One, avoiding confrontations with any competent Adversary. It's all that's kept him in office up until now, while he concentrates on his dream of becoming the leader of the modern world. He's counting fully on the self centered Main media and his army of Community Organizers to pull him through this one. He avoids any chance of being confronted.
Newt Gingrich, even with all his "So called" Baggage, is the man who could bring him down regardless of what he does, apart from Donald Duck and Mickey Mouse getting in on the voting process. The only thing that could hold Newt back at this point in the race, is his need for the almighty dollar to back him. If he can muster that, he'll most likely win.
Newt Gingrich is a true believer in the Constitution, knows it, believes in standing by it and is willing to pursue the life time appointments of Judges to elected term limits. He is dedicated and honest in his proposals for sticking to our original, Democratic Republic way of life.
Let's not forget Ron Paul! I first thought he made sense but as the race goes on, he is portraying himself as an extreme nut. He can do nothing but harm in this affair, including throwing the unseating of Obama under the bus by tossing his zany hat in the ring as an Independent, thereby pulling votes away mainly from the chosen Republican Candidate.
His brains have yet to shift from where they are, back up to his brain. Just sayin'.
Saturday, December 17, 2011
I HOPE I DIDN"T HEAR THIS STORY CORRECTLY.
email me macgeo2345@hotmail.com
Read my blogs http:/macgeo1234.blogspot.com
Tyson foods wants to get into the "Green" Bio-fuel business along with other anonymous investors. so they form a company under a different name. The Obama Administration fully funds this Co. to get
into business from Taxpayer's future dollars, to the tune of approx. $500,000,000.00
They begin full production which proves to be far more costly than anticipated, compared to fossil fuels. They go ahead and produce 450,000 gallons anyway. All of this prompted by the EPA.
Then Obama buys it back at $15.00 a gallon amounting to $6,750,000.00 and places it into the Navy reserve. The Navy reserve already has 600,000,000 gallons in reserve.
It's revealed that Tyson foods is one of Obama's larger contributors to Obama's 2012 re-election campaign.
Is there anybody who doesn't understand why we need to place a suspension on the EPA? A monstrous division of Gov't brought about by a minor Special Interest Group of Environmentalists?
Or why the current Administration shouldn't be kicked out of office?
I really do understand the reason for the EPA in a proper context, but when they get so powerful they think they don't have to compromise, they're doing more harm than good.
The dreadful thought is though, they may not be finished yet.I haven't heard of them being shut down. Is this "Front" company on there way to brewing another batch?
Has Barack Obama pulled out all the stops in his attempt to get more money for his re-elction? Is there more to come of this "Green" thing.? Are we still on the tip of the iceberg?
Tell me it ain't so! They don't call him "Honest Barack" for nothing. Just sayin'.
Read my blogs http:/macgeo1234.blogspot.com
Tyson foods wants to get into the "Green" Bio-fuel business along with other anonymous investors. so they form a company under a different name. The Obama Administration fully funds this Co. to get
into business from Taxpayer's future dollars, to the tune of approx. $500,000,000.00
They begin full production which proves to be far more costly than anticipated, compared to fossil fuels. They go ahead and produce 450,000 gallons anyway. All of this prompted by the EPA.
Then Obama buys it back at $15.00 a gallon amounting to $6,750,000.00 and places it into the Navy reserve. The Navy reserve already has 600,000,000 gallons in reserve.
It's revealed that Tyson foods is one of Obama's larger contributors to Obama's 2012 re-election campaign.
Is there anybody who doesn't understand why we need to place a suspension on the EPA? A monstrous division of Gov't brought about by a minor Special Interest Group of Environmentalists?
Or why the current Administration shouldn't be kicked out of office?
I really do understand the reason for the EPA in a proper context, but when they get so powerful they think they don't have to compromise, they're doing more harm than good.
The dreadful thought is though, they may not be finished yet.I haven't heard of them being shut down. Is this "Front" company on there way to brewing another batch?
Has Barack Obama pulled out all the stops in his attempt to get more money for his re-elction? Is there more to come of this "Green" thing.? Are we still on the tip of the iceberg?
Tell me it ain't so! They don't call him "Honest Barack" for nothing. Just sayin'.
Friday, December 16, 2011
MY BODY, HEART, CONSCIENCE AND SOUL, WHERE SHOULD IT GO?
email me macgeo2345@hotmail.com
read my blogs http:/macgeo1234.blogspot.com
At the age of 0, I was given a body, a heart, a conscience and a Soul.
At the age of 2 weeks, my body was presented to God by way of Baptism.
At the age of six, I put my soul in the hands of religion by way of confirmation.
At the age of 13, I put my body under the control of tobacco.
At the age of 16, I put my body under the control of Alcohol.
At the age of 19, I put my heart in the hands of a wife.
At the age of 21, my body, heart, conscience and Soul was placed in charge of my family.
At the age of 26, I took my body, heart, conscience and soul away from my family.
At the age of 29, I became a man and brought my body, heart, conscience and soul back to my kids.
At the age of 40, I took my body away from tobacco.
At the age of 53, I took my body away from alcohol.
At the age of 75, I owe my body and heart to medical science, my conscience to my wife, family and friends, my soul to God and my ass to the bill collectors and the I.R.S.
God knows, I love them all!! Just sayin'.
read my blogs http:/macgeo1234.blogspot.com
At the age of 0, I was given a body, a heart, a conscience and a Soul.
At the age of 2 weeks, my body was presented to God by way of Baptism.
At the age of six, I put my soul in the hands of religion by way of confirmation.
At the age of 13, I put my body under the control of tobacco.
At the age of 16, I put my body under the control of Alcohol.
At the age of 19, I put my heart in the hands of a wife.
At the age of 21, my body, heart, conscience and Soul was placed in charge of my family.
At the age of 26, I took my body, heart, conscience and soul away from my family.
At the age of 29, I became a man and brought my body, heart, conscience and soul back to my kids.
At the age of 40, I took my body away from tobacco.
At the age of 53, I took my body away from alcohol.
At the age of 75, I owe my body and heart to medical science, my conscience to my wife, family and friends, my soul to God and my ass to the bill collectors and the I.R.S.
God knows, I love them all!! Just sayin'.
Thursday, December 15, 2011
MY GREAT 75th BIRTHDAY CELEBRATION. A DAY TO REMEMBER.
email me macgeo2345@hotmail.com
Read my blogs http:/macgeo1234.blogspot.com
I usually have my coffee in the morning after I prepare myself for the day. Then after watching the news and "Wild Africa" with my wife, I head for Starbucks to read the paper.
After approximately 3 years I have gotten to know almost everyone in the Haggen store, and particularly Starbucks. It's a pleasant place to prepare for the day, gather with my friends for an hour and a half or so for discussion of a variety of subjects, knowing that someone in the group is bound to be an expert and often times are. The group has been growing larger and larger by the week or month, and consists of people of diverse backgrounds in many fields of experience.
I usually go there every morning before 8 A.M. and am always cheerfully greeted by the usual people as I settle down to my tall coffee. I proceed to read the headlines of the morning paper.
From then on, the other friends begin arriving and the paper gets set aside to be read later on by my wife at home. It's always a lively get together and to say the least, informative and therapeutic.
It prepares everyone for the day in a mostly positive sense.
But not on the 23rd, my 75th birthday. I woke up that morning realizing it was my birthday, and decided to stay home with my wife and just laze around. I didn't go to Starbucks as usual and did nothing all day, except to wonder how many birthdays I might have left. At 75, it doesn't take long to do that!
The following morning, It was back to Starbucks as usual and on with the enjoyable routine of meeting with the group.
On th 14th of Dec., yesterday, We were all invited to Kelly and Karen's beautiful home to celebrate Christmas. Everyone showed up without exception, to the tune of about 20 people. they had decorated 2 beautiful trees, the fireplace was going, the food was out and everyone was in a festive mood.
It could not have been nicer. But all of a sudden it was! Kelly came out with a cake, announced my name and my 75th birthday, then presented it to me, and they all together sang "Happy Birthday".
To their surprise, I announced to them it was the first birthday party of my entire life. My wife can attest to the fact that it was the surprise of my life, and it humbled me more than I had ever been humbled before. They'll never know how close I came to shedding happy tears.
We went on to enjoy the evening, also as never before.
My thanks to each and every one of them for being my friends. It's the second time they have proven themselves as friends to me. The prior time was throwing their support to me when I was ill in the hospital 4 months ago. They were my friends then and they're even more-so my friends now.
Just sayin'.
Read my blogs http:/macgeo1234.blogspot.com
I usually have my coffee in the morning after I prepare myself for the day. Then after watching the news and "Wild Africa" with my wife, I head for Starbucks to read the paper.
After approximately 3 years I have gotten to know almost everyone in the Haggen store, and particularly Starbucks. It's a pleasant place to prepare for the day, gather with my friends for an hour and a half or so for discussion of a variety of subjects, knowing that someone in the group is bound to be an expert and often times are. The group has been growing larger and larger by the week or month, and consists of people of diverse backgrounds in many fields of experience.
I usually go there every morning before 8 A.M. and am always cheerfully greeted by the usual people as I settle down to my tall coffee. I proceed to read the headlines of the morning paper.
From then on, the other friends begin arriving and the paper gets set aside to be read later on by my wife at home. It's always a lively get together and to say the least, informative and therapeutic.
It prepares everyone for the day in a mostly positive sense.
But not on the 23rd, my 75th birthday. I woke up that morning realizing it was my birthday, and decided to stay home with my wife and just laze around. I didn't go to Starbucks as usual and did nothing all day, except to wonder how many birthdays I might have left. At 75, it doesn't take long to do that!
The following morning, It was back to Starbucks as usual and on with the enjoyable routine of meeting with the group.
On th 14th of Dec., yesterday, We were all invited to Kelly and Karen's beautiful home to celebrate Christmas. Everyone showed up without exception, to the tune of about 20 people. they had decorated 2 beautiful trees, the fireplace was going, the food was out and everyone was in a festive mood.
It could not have been nicer. But all of a sudden it was! Kelly came out with a cake, announced my name and my 75th birthday, then presented it to me, and they all together sang "Happy Birthday".
To their surprise, I announced to them it was the first birthday party of my entire life. My wife can attest to the fact that it was the surprise of my life, and it humbled me more than I had ever been humbled before. They'll never know how close I came to shedding happy tears.
We went on to enjoy the evening, also as never before.
My thanks to each and every one of them for being my friends. It's the second time they have proven themselves as friends to me. The prior time was throwing their support to me when I was ill in the hospital 4 months ago. They were my friends then and they're even more-so my friends now.
Just sayin'.
A PERFECTLY GOOD REPUBLICAN ADMINISTRATION IS CURRENTLY IN FRONT OF US.
Email me macgeo2345@hotmail.com
Read my blogs http:/macgeo1234.blogspot.com
In our eagerness to watch the Republican Presidential Candidate debates, I see a group of intelligent people who, with all their talents and mixed philosophies on differing subjects, could make the next great Republican Presidential Administration. Regardless of who gets chosen for Presidential Candidate.
Instead of pointing out each other's faults from the past, which every human being on earth has, they could easily take up their various second choice positions in the future Gov't and run as a complete team. It would be unprecedented from the past. They could all then join hands with a common group of goals and Ideas that would be acceptable to all of the Silent Majority's desires for a return to a true Democratic Republic, and to hell with this minority, Socialist path that Obama and his disciples are trying to lead us down.
Imagine what they could accomplish if they all put their heads together and agreed on the same idea that they really have anyway. And that's defeating the Special Interest groups unharnessed dominance over this great Country.
Instead of waiting for the results of the 2012 election for one man to choose his administration, which is always a chore, they would be able to decide their major positions and how they would correct the many mistakes of the past and present. All done before hand and, if presented properly and with common sense, would please the majority of the general Electorate. They could do it! Having done that, the whole Populace would know what they would be getting ahead of time when it comes to policies. With the General Public knowing them beforehand, it would also aid the Republican controlled House and or Senate in approving or disapproving in future legislative decisions.
They're each and every one good reliable folks, with fresh and unharnessed dreams.
Oh, oh, just woke up from another ridiculous dream! Just sayin'.
:
Read my blogs http:/macgeo1234.blogspot.com
In our eagerness to watch the Republican Presidential Candidate debates, I see a group of intelligent people who, with all their talents and mixed philosophies on differing subjects, could make the next great Republican Presidential Administration. Regardless of who gets chosen for Presidential Candidate.
Instead of pointing out each other's faults from the past, which every human being on earth has, they could easily take up their various second choice positions in the future Gov't and run as a complete team. It would be unprecedented from the past. They could all then join hands with a common group of goals and Ideas that would be acceptable to all of the Silent Majority's desires for a return to a true Democratic Republic, and to hell with this minority, Socialist path that Obama and his disciples are trying to lead us down.
Imagine what they could accomplish if they all put their heads together and agreed on the same idea that they really have anyway. And that's defeating the Special Interest groups unharnessed dominance over this great Country.
Instead of waiting for the results of the 2012 election for one man to choose his administration, which is always a chore, they would be able to decide their major positions and how they would correct the many mistakes of the past and present. All done before hand and, if presented properly and with common sense, would please the majority of the general Electorate. They could do it! Having done that, the whole Populace would know what they would be getting ahead of time when it comes to policies. With the General Public knowing them beforehand, it would also aid the Republican controlled House and or Senate in approving or disapproving in future legislative decisions.
They're each and every one good reliable folks, with fresh and unharnessed dreams.
Oh, oh, just woke up from another ridiculous dream! Just sayin'.
:
REGULATIONS, REGULATIONS, REGULATIONS!!!
email me macgeo2345@hotmail.
read my blogs http:/macgeo1234.blogspot.com
I'm sure most people would agree with me that the main reason we vote someone into Gov't is for regulation purposes first of all. But we expect "common sense" type regulations. Regulations that would make sense to both the private industry operators and the consumers. Regulations that are always mindful of our Constitution and Bill of Rights.
That's the way it was mean't to be, I'm sure. But that's not the way it has become. I mean, back in the days before Special Interest groups, the Gov't was selected to represent the affairs of the common people. When this was done, they decided that those elected officials couldn't run things on shoelaces, so they established a menial tax in order to pay for the operational expenses. The Gov't organized itself and began regulating the private sector in a way that protected the basic rights of all parties concerned.
A regular military was established, Mail delivery was begun, Necessary things like that.
It worked well, except that isn't the way it's working today. Over the years, Special interest groups began lobbying the elected officials and soon regulations were being put in place that would benefit a certain organization but in turn be detrimental to the consumer without due consideration.
The Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) is the most prime example of this, but it doesn't stop there by any means.
When talking to friends in the know, the medical industry suffers from the same manifestation of regulations as well. Without focusing on any specific instance, there is a problem with old regulations colliding with new ones that have been put into play. Instead of abolishing the old one at the same time to avoid further confusion. Whether this is intentional by the Special Interest Regulators or not is another question. or a matter of the same people demanding the regulating, ignoring the fact that the old regulation along with the new one creates a conflict of interest. Along with that they just may not give a darn if it does or doesn't throw a monkey wrench in the works. It's not their money.
It could be both, couldn't it? I think we can assume that it is!!
What I'm told it's doing, is creating a tremendous delay while some other regulator or Judge stops to figure it out. In turn it creates an enormous amount of financial waste.
Now the tax system gets toyed with so the Gov't, instead of re-regulating to solve the problem and saving further unnecessary expenditures, raises the taxes to meet the added expense. Problem solved, right? WRONG!!! They have neglected to address the difference between the old regulation and the new one, so they follow the line of least resistance by raising the taxes to meet the additional waste of the Taxpayer's money. The Special Interest groups proffer, the consumers pay!
Anyway, with the regulations in place to suit the desires of the Special Interest Groups, the Gov't doesn't care how it affects the consumer. They're ignoring the very principle used to place them in office in the first place.
The medical profession is affected tremendously by this, because now we have the budget cutting process where the Medical profession as a whole, is restricted from charging the same money that kept them wanting to treat Medicare and Medicaid patients now, to not wanting to accept them due to the decreased allowable payment. At this moment, this is happening.
All because the regulations are mishandled by the Gov't in it's refusal to recognize the waste and take the time to correct it in the proper manner.
This affects the consumer in the back pocket simply because the politicians have lost track of the reason they were put in office, which of course is to protect the Consumer, not to submit to the Special Interest groups!!
The reason our Gov't was established in the first place was to protect the General Electorate in various ways, instead they're satisfying the needs of Special Interest groups who have the money to support them if they want to survive the next election. Again, it's all about money.
Pass a regulation against Lobbyists for Special Interests, and while you're at it, get Tort Reform working as well. Malpractice suits have been long out of hand and will be until a reasonable limit is placed on the amount paid out in malpractice suits.
The politicians are appeasing the obstructionists, because of the lure of money.
Wow!!! I just woke up from a nightmare!! Just sayin'.
in
read my blogs http:/macgeo1234.blogspot.com
I'm sure most people would agree with me that the main reason we vote someone into Gov't is for regulation purposes first of all. But we expect "common sense" type regulations. Regulations that would make sense to both the private industry operators and the consumers. Regulations that are always mindful of our Constitution and Bill of Rights.
That's the way it was mean't to be, I'm sure. But that's not the way it has become. I mean, back in the days before Special Interest groups, the Gov't was selected to represent the affairs of the common people. When this was done, they decided that those elected officials couldn't run things on shoelaces, so they established a menial tax in order to pay for the operational expenses. The Gov't organized itself and began regulating the private sector in a way that protected the basic rights of all parties concerned.
A regular military was established, Mail delivery was begun, Necessary things like that.
It worked well, except that isn't the way it's working today. Over the years, Special interest groups began lobbying the elected officials and soon regulations were being put in place that would benefit a certain organization but in turn be detrimental to the consumer without due consideration.
The Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) is the most prime example of this, but it doesn't stop there by any means.
When talking to friends in the know, the medical industry suffers from the same manifestation of regulations as well. Without focusing on any specific instance, there is a problem with old regulations colliding with new ones that have been put into play. Instead of abolishing the old one at the same time to avoid further confusion. Whether this is intentional by the Special Interest Regulators or not is another question. or a matter of the same people demanding the regulating, ignoring the fact that the old regulation along with the new one creates a conflict of interest. Along with that they just may not give a darn if it does or doesn't throw a monkey wrench in the works. It's not their money.
It could be both, couldn't it? I think we can assume that it is!!
What I'm told it's doing, is creating a tremendous delay while some other regulator or Judge stops to figure it out. In turn it creates an enormous amount of financial waste.
Now the tax system gets toyed with so the Gov't, instead of re-regulating to solve the problem and saving further unnecessary expenditures, raises the taxes to meet the added expense. Problem solved, right? WRONG!!! They have neglected to address the difference between the old regulation and the new one, so they follow the line of least resistance by raising the taxes to meet the additional waste of the Taxpayer's money. The Special Interest groups proffer, the consumers pay!
Anyway, with the regulations in place to suit the desires of the Special Interest Groups, the Gov't doesn't care how it affects the consumer. They're ignoring the very principle used to place them in office in the first place.
The medical profession is affected tremendously by this, because now we have the budget cutting process where the Medical profession as a whole, is restricted from charging the same money that kept them wanting to treat Medicare and Medicaid patients now, to not wanting to accept them due to the decreased allowable payment. At this moment, this is happening.
All because the regulations are mishandled by the Gov't in it's refusal to recognize the waste and take the time to correct it in the proper manner.
This affects the consumer in the back pocket simply because the politicians have lost track of the reason they were put in office, which of course is to protect the Consumer, not to submit to the Special Interest groups!!
The reason our Gov't was established in the first place was to protect the General Electorate in various ways, instead they're satisfying the needs of Special Interest groups who have the money to support them if they want to survive the next election. Again, it's all about money.
Pass a regulation against Lobbyists for Special Interests, and while you're at it, get Tort Reform working as well. Malpractice suits have been long out of hand and will be until a reasonable limit is placed on the amount paid out in malpractice suits.
The politicians are appeasing the obstructionists, because of the lure of money.
Wow!!! I just woke up from a nightmare!! Just sayin'.
in
Tuesday, December 13, 2011
IS THE REPUBLICAN PARTY LOOKING FOR SOMEONE PERFECT?
email me macgeo2345@hotmail.com
read my blogs http:/macgeo1234.blogspot.com
THERE IS NOBODY!!
In watching the "Factor" today, Charles Krauthammer so eloquently explained why Newt Gingrich's "baggage" instead of his attributions, might stop him from winning in the 2012 Election.
The problem is here, the "good Old Boys" from the fast fading "Old Fart" Republican Party are afraid of Newt Gingrich's positive prowess and not being the candidate of their choice, would rather destroy him before he gets that far!
Newt Gingrich, with his "on the spot" ability to respond to accusations and questions about his so-called baggage, is quite capable of turning a negative into a positive on the spot, with his uncanny memory and knowledge of the political past and the past in general. History is his triumph.
Yet, because he may be able to operate as President with or without their political savvy, it appears to me they want to hand his "misgivings" to the Socialists on a platter.
Instead of criticizing him as though he were the opposition, they need to point out his brilliance and capabilities to the undecided voters who could quite easily turn around and vote for Obama again.
They seem to want to throw him and the election under the bus, rather than take up his charge to the White House. They've done the same thing to the Tea Party as well, when the members didn't come running to him and karl Rove for advice.
They aren't going to run to anybody, Charles. They're displaying the backbone of independence and are looking for a true leader.They are the votes than can put a good challenger over the top.
I say join the movement or get the hell out of the way. This country cannot afford to go back to "Old Fart" politics. We're all smarter than that now and it only looks and sounds foolish. Rick Perry is the tail end of old Dinosaurs. Forget him!! Charm isn't what we need and Texas can still use him.
Instead of cutting his past up surgically, they need to be accepting Newt as the clear front runner for now, and help him slice away at the past of the Socialist Party and the most dangerous man in the U.S. today, Barack Obama. Charles and Karl are both smart men but shouldn't let their vanity blind them.
Get off your ego, get onto your war horses and join the movement of reality so we can get America back on it's dollar producing feet.
The Socialists are going to try to politically assassinate anybody who runs against their principals. Why not have someone who's more than capable of handing it back with more knowledge and skill than I've seen in this race so far. Get off the negative end of it.
Newt Gingrich is the only man I see that's capable of knowing what the Lefties are going to do next, and how to handle them when they do.
Turn him loose on them and watch the fun. Just sayin'.
read my blogs http:/macgeo1234.blogspot.com
THERE IS NOBODY!!
In watching the "Factor" today, Charles Krauthammer so eloquently explained why Newt Gingrich's "baggage" instead of his attributions, might stop him from winning in the 2012 Election.
The problem is here, the "good Old Boys" from the fast fading "Old Fart" Republican Party are afraid of Newt Gingrich's positive prowess and not being the candidate of their choice, would rather destroy him before he gets that far!
Newt Gingrich, with his "on the spot" ability to respond to accusations and questions about his so-called baggage, is quite capable of turning a negative into a positive on the spot, with his uncanny memory and knowledge of the political past and the past in general. History is his triumph.
Yet, because he may be able to operate as President with or without their political savvy, it appears to me they want to hand his "misgivings" to the Socialists on a platter.
Instead of criticizing him as though he were the opposition, they need to point out his brilliance and capabilities to the undecided voters who could quite easily turn around and vote for Obama again.
They seem to want to throw him and the election under the bus, rather than take up his charge to the White House. They've done the same thing to the Tea Party as well, when the members didn't come running to him and karl Rove for advice.
They aren't going to run to anybody, Charles. They're displaying the backbone of independence and are looking for a true leader.They are the votes than can put a good challenger over the top.
I say join the movement or get the hell out of the way. This country cannot afford to go back to "Old Fart" politics. We're all smarter than that now and it only looks and sounds foolish. Rick Perry is the tail end of old Dinosaurs. Forget him!! Charm isn't what we need and Texas can still use him.
Instead of cutting his past up surgically, they need to be accepting Newt as the clear front runner for now, and help him slice away at the past of the Socialist Party and the most dangerous man in the U.S. today, Barack Obama. Charles and Karl are both smart men but shouldn't let their vanity blind them.
Get off your ego, get onto your war horses and join the movement of reality so we can get America back on it's dollar producing feet.
The Socialists are going to try to politically assassinate anybody who runs against their principals. Why not have someone who's more than capable of handing it back with more knowledge and skill than I've seen in this race so far. Get off the negative end of it.
Newt Gingrich is the only man I see that's capable of knowing what the Lefties are going to do next, and how to handle them when they do.
Turn him loose on them and watch the fun. Just sayin'.
A TRILLION DOLLAR APPROPRIATIONS BILL AND A 3 DAY TIME PERIOD TO PASS IT??
Email me macgeo2345@hotmail.com
Read my blogs http:/macgeo1234.blogspot.com
The House of Representatives is attempting to pass an Appropriations Bill for approx. 1 trillion dollars. 1 TRILLION DOLLARS!!
Now we all know that the reason for our debt today is partially because of important Bills being signed and voted on after each representative has attached their additional side bills to it.
This results in a Bill being inflated by the time it gets to the Approval process by double or often more. For example: If the main purpose of the Bill is a projected cost of 500 billion dollars to start with, it can easily be doubled after each congressman has attached their little desires to it. It can easily reach a Trillion dollars. They are called Earmarks. Let's say Barney Frank wants a Footbridge over a Creek that would allow customers easier access to his illegal house of male prostitution. He would simply figure the cost and fix it to the Bill. He might call it the "Bridge to Underwear" or something like that. Thank God he's announced his retirement. (There's no exaggeration about the house of male prostitution, either. His male lover ran it.)
You can see how a bill could get inflated after it goes by 435 House Representatives.
That doesn't mean they'll even read the Initial bill. they just need to attach their little Earmark they know they're going to get, if it passes.
I understand that there's a proposed requirement for the Bill to be posted in a public square where the electorate can read it for 72 hrs. before it's passed. This is in order that you and I can't say we didn't have a chance to read it before it's passed. Well, we know that's not going to happen because it could be tied up for years before every curious onlooker has read it. That's not efficient because there's already enough hold-up in the Bill passing process, between that and attaching the Earmarks. But we can certainly require each Congressman to at least set aside time to read the bill during the 72 hr. period. Perhaps serve them with a free "School lunch". (Just a pun.)
And that would eliminate one majority of Congress from having the privilege of passing a bill behind closed doors without the opposing legislators being present to read it. (It happened in the passage of Obamacare.)
And, I understand that a group of Congressmen are presenting a bill that would prevent Earmarks from being included with a Primary Bill. If I have my information right, that would solve a whole lot of other expenditures and problems down the "Can kicking" road, wouldn't it?
In the meantime though, let's make sure they take whatever time is reasonably needed to READ THE BILL!!! Just sayin'.
Read my blogs http:/macgeo1234.blogspot.com
The House of Representatives is attempting to pass an Appropriations Bill for approx. 1 trillion dollars. 1 TRILLION DOLLARS!!
Now we all know that the reason for our debt today is partially because of important Bills being signed and voted on after each representative has attached their additional side bills to it.
This results in a Bill being inflated by the time it gets to the Approval process by double or often more. For example: If the main purpose of the Bill is a projected cost of 500 billion dollars to start with, it can easily be doubled after each congressman has attached their little desires to it. It can easily reach a Trillion dollars. They are called Earmarks. Let's say Barney Frank wants a Footbridge over a Creek that would allow customers easier access to his illegal house of male prostitution. He would simply figure the cost and fix it to the Bill. He might call it the "Bridge to Underwear" or something like that. Thank God he's announced his retirement. (There's no exaggeration about the house of male prostitution, either. His male lover ran it.)
You can see how a bill could get inflated after it goes by 435 House Representatives.
That doesn't mean they'll even read the Initial bill. they just need to attach their little Earmark they know they're going to get, if it passes.
I understand that there's a proposed requirement for the Bill to be posted in a public square where the electorate can read it for 72 hrs. before it's passed. This is in order that you and I can't say we didn't have a chance to read it before it's passed. Well, we know that's not going to happen because it could be tied up for years before every curious onlooker has read it. That's not efficient because there's already enough hold-up in the Bill passing process, between that and attaching the Earmarks. But we can certainly require each Congressman to at least set aside time to read the bill during the 72 hr. period. Perhaps serve them with a free "School lunch". (Just a pun.)
And that would eliminate one majority of Congress from having the privilege of passing a bill behind closed doors without the opposing legislators being present to read it. (It happened in the passage of Obamacare.)
And, I understand that a group of Congressmen are presenting a bill that would prevent Earmarks from being included with a Primary Bill. If I have my information right, that would solve a whole lot of other expenditures and problems down the "Can kicking" road, wouldn't it?
In the meantime though, let's make sure they take whatever time is reasonably needed to READ THE BILL!!! Just sayin'.
Monday, December 12, 2011
IS THE UNEMPLOYMENT RATE OF 8.6% AN ACTUAL FACT?
email me macgeo2345@hotmail.com
Read my blogs http:/macgeo1234.blogspot.com
I'm not going to guess how the Obama Administration calculates the Unemployment rate in this country, but it's definitely in a way that's to make us think it's accurate.
If it is, then my math must be a little bit fuzzy. To the contrary, I don't believe it is!
Debbie Wasserman Schultz, Chairwomen of the DNC in an interview with Fox News today, after saying the unemployment rate was down to 8.6%, was reminded by Gretchen Carlson that one out of every four workers in America is not working. A statistical fact. Now, I know that anybody in the Tea Party can figure in their heads, it comes to 25% who are unemployed. Right Folks??
They must be counting only the ones that are still on the unemployment rolls, some of whom are going into their third year of remaining there. I'm sure they would be more than happy to go back to work. Also, they aren't counting the small business people who didn't qualify for Employment benefits and make up a good portion of the Tea Party. Yes, I'm sure 25% is far more realistic.
The way they calculate it must be similar to the inflation rate where it shows it holding steady, although the cost of groceries by themselves have risen at least 30% in the last year alone. On top of that, they add insult to injury by saying the Tea Party isn't smart enough to understand. To heck they don't!! Watch how they vote in this next election!
Don't be surprised though, if the Critical prices come down considerably this year and then go back up after the Election in November. Economists in the know will tell you it always happens in an election year. It doesn't fool me. Don't let it fool you either. Just sayin'.
Read my blogs http:/macgeo1234.blogspot.com
I'm not going to guess how the Obama Administration calculates the Unemployment rate in this country, but it's definitely in a way that's to make us think it's accurate.
If it is, then my math must be a little bit fuzzy. To the contrary, I don't believe it is!
Debbie Wasserman Schultz, Chairwomen of the DNC in an interview with Fox News today, after saying the unemployment rate was down to 8.6%, was reminded by Gretchen Carlson that one out of every four workers in America is not working. A statistical fact. Now, I know that anybody in the Tea Party can figure in their heads, it comes to 25% who are unemployed. Right Folks??
They must be counting only the ones that are still on the unemployment rolls, some of whom are going into their third year of remaining there. I'm sure they would be more than happy to go back to work. Also, they aren't counting the small business people who didn't qualify for Employment benefits and make up a good portion of the Tea Party. Yes, I'm sure 25% is far more realistic.
The way they calculate it must be similar to the inflation rate where it shows it holding steady, although the cost of groceries by themselves have risen at least 30% in the last year alone. On top of that, they add insult to injury by saying the Tea Party isn't smart enough to understand. To heck they don't!! Watch how they vote in this next election!
Don't be surprised though, if the Critical prices come down considerably this year and then go back up after the Election in November. Economists in the know will tell you it always happens in an election year. It doesn't fool me. Don't let it fool you either. Just sayin'.
THE JOY IN WATCHING THE REPUBLICAN DEBATES.
email me macgeo2345@hotmail.com
read my blogs http:/macgeo1234.blogspot.com
In comparing notes between the differing way Republicans campaign and Socialists do, I found it to be not a time wasting exercise. So I'm going to go ahead and not waste my time. If you got through that message successfully, by all means read on! (I picked that up from a Community Organizer I know, or to update that, knew!)
The Republican debates for Presidential Candidate have been going for some months now, and I'm pleased to realize they can each independently, think for themselves. It brings on different opinions from each candidate on what a President's job is and how the Gov't should be ran. They get into heated exchanges sometimes, even offering to wager bets on who's right.
With six potential candidates involved, the varying subjects can be, and are quite interesting and educational. Which is why they have cause to debate in the first place.
I'm sure our Founding Fathers debated in the very same way when they formed this Greatest Nation on Earth. It has proven to be healthy, informative and best of all, good to know they can still feel free to speak their own minds without persecution or fear of being excommunicated from the Republican Party.
I can picture our Founding Fathers behaving in much the same manner, even way back then. They did okay then, didn't they?
What bothers me though, is the criticism by the Socialist Main media about the way they discuss their differences. They describe the behavior as confused, mixed up in beliefs and not being able to agree on anything. I believe the most dangerous thing to freedom as we know it today is, NOT being allowed by law to say what you mean and mean what you say. Political correctness does more damage than good when placed in the hands of the wrong thinking people such as the Socialists. They are masters of disguise. They monopolize on your misinformation and do not practice what they preach, whatever that is.
What I DO understand they preach is, silence until spoken to, and then watch what you say. In authoritative positions, they say what they believe, but if what you say conflicts with their philosophy, you're out. As Joe biden said to the AFL/CIO in his rebel rousing speech to the Union members, " if you don't vote the way we want you to vote, "YOU'RE ON YOUR OWN, JACK!!!!
Tell me that doesn't take away the Freedom of democratic choice from the members!!!
See what I mean?
Although the Socialist Main Media portrays the Republican Candidates debates as disorganized, It's really not. It's giving the general population the insight for determining who they want to vote for. So watch the debates with an open mind, Folks. It's an exercise in TRUE Democracy and the debaters are offering you the freedom of choice. Something you may not have after election day of 2012.
as for the Debaters, They all have their points to consider. My wish would be to whoever gets in, use the rest for your administration. They all have something of value to contribute and would do well in their properly assigned positions.
Whether or not the Socialist minded voters noticed it, Barack Obama and his appointed Cronies have already taken away the freedom of choice. The Socialist Party has railroaded any chance of the Sheeple getting a fair choice. There are no debates for them to be able to voice their opinions. All they have, whether they like it or not, is Marxist minded Barack Hussein Obama. No Christian here, Jack!!
Be wise Socialist voters. There's nothing but poverty and disappointment for the bulk of you at the end of this Melee, If you don't believe me, just look at the dismal failures of the Socialist Gov'ts in Europe. They've already gone the way Obama wants to take YOU!
Ignorance is bliss, but not in this case. Just sayin'.
read my blogs http:/macgeo1234.blogspot.com
In comparing notes between the differing way Republicans campaign and Socialists do, I found it to be not a time wasting exercise. So I'm going to go ahead and not waste my time. If you got through that message successfully, by all means read on! (I picked that up from a Community Organizer I know, or to update that, knew!)
The Republican debates for Presidential Candidate have been going for some months now, and I'm pleased to realize they can each independently, think for themselves. It brings on different opinions from each candidate on what a President's job is and how the Gov't should be ran. They get into heated exchanges sometimes, even offering to wager bets on who's right.
With six potential candidates involved, the varying subjects can be, and are quite interesting and educational. Which is why they have cause to debate in the first place.
I'm sure our Founding Fathers debated in the very same way when they formed this Greatest Nation on Earth. It has proven to be healthy, informative and best of all, good to know they can still feel free to speak their own minds without persecution or fear of being excommunicated from the Republican Party.
I can picture our Founding Fathers behaving in much the same manner, even way back then. They did okay then, didn't they?
What bothers me though, is the criticism by the Socialist Main media about the way they discuss their differences. They describe the behavior as confused, mixed up in beliefs and not being able to agree on anything. I believe the most dangerous thing to freedom as we know it today is, NOT being allowed by law to say what you mean and mean what you say. Political correctness does more damage than good when placed in the hands of the wrong thinking people such as the Socialists. They are masters of disguise. They monopolize on your misinformation and do not practice what they preach, whatever that is.
What I DO understand they preach is, silence until spoken to, and then watch what you say. In authoritative positions, they say what they believe, but if what you say conflicts with their philosophy, you're out. As Joe biden said to the AFL/CIO in his rebel rousing speech to the Union members, " if you don't vote the way we want you to vote, "YOU'RE ON YOUR OWN, JACK!!!!
Tell me that doesn't take away the Freedom of democratic choice from the members!!!
See what I mean?
Although the Socialist Main Media portrays the Republican Candidates debates as disorganized, It's really not. It's giving the general population the insight for determining who they want to vote for. So watch the debates with an open mind, Folks. It's an exercise in TRUE Democracy and the debaters are offering you the freedom of choice. Something you may not have after election day of 2012.
as for the Debaters, They all have their points to consider. My wish would be to whoever gets in, use the rest for your administration. They all have something of value to contribute and would do well in their properly assigned positions.
Whether or not the Socialist minded voters noticed it, Barack Obama and his appointed Cronies have already taken away the freedom of choice. The Socialist Party has railroaded any chance of the Sheeple getting a fair choice. There are no debates for them to be able to voice their opinions. All they have, whether they like it or not, is Marxist minded Barack Hussein Obama. No Christian here, Jack!!
Be wise Socialist voters. There's nothing but poverty and disappointment for the bulk of you at the end of this Melee, If you don't believe me, just look at the dismal failures of the Socialist Gov'ts in Europe. They've already gone the way Obama wants to take YOU!
Ignorance is bliss, but not in this case. Just sayin'.
Sunday, December 11, 2011
AN UNEXPECTED SURPRISE FROM THE SEATTLE TIMES TODAY. I LIKE IT!!
email me macgeo2345@hotmail.com
read my blogs http:/macgeo1234.blogspot.com
I'm enlightened and pleased to discover an article in the Seattle times addressing the Occupy Seattle protesters, an arm of the Wall Street protesters in New York and affiliated protesters across the Nation.
Thank you, Seattle times for your honesty in reporting and exposing the real Community Organizers behind the movement. Considering you're based on the Left Coast, that had to be a "from the heart" decision to call it the way it is.
Many quotes from your article will be used in this blog.
As I have mentioned in my previous blogs, I suspected there was financial support supplied in their so-called phony "Grass roots"protesting.
Once a few Bums began looking for a free ride on Wall Street, The professional Community Organizers jumped into play, inspired by Barack Obama. On his behalf, I believe, The "volunteers" from Working Washington went door to dooring looking for more recruits to join the protests. They actually canvassed 100,000 homes to come up with a few hundred more protesters. They wouldn't have done very well selling Fuller Brush products, that's for sure!!
When the protests first began, they had signs made from Cardboard boxes with dislexic printing all over them. Corn flakes boxes, etc. Some of them wore the boxes on their heads when it rained. Most of them when asked, didn't even know why they were there!
Then the store printed signs began to show and the organizers began speaking on behalf of the protesters, with the likes of Michael Moore and Barney "buttbanger" Frank. Then "Doo Doo" Sharpton appeared on the scene. Three clowns at a make believe circus.
I must define the "Working Washington Group". Although they describe themselves as non-profit "Grass Roots", they aren't grass roots or non-profit. Working Washington is an arm of the Service Employees International Union.(SEIU). I don't know what's "working" about them if they don't have a job. Does the "Non-profit" part qualify them for a Grant or Waiver of some kind???
I mean, if the Socialists are looking for a grant, they'll be the ones that know how to get it out of Obama! It looks like "Working Washington" is supported by other groups as well, like labor and consumer groups, including the Teamster's Union and Washington Community Action network.
Talk about commingling, huh?
The Working Washington Group was behind the planned takeover of the University Bridge on Nov. 17th,along with recent demonstrations in Olympia. The Working Washington group is now planning to take over the "Occupy" protesters completely. They have what the Occupy protesters do not, money, organization skills and political shrewdness. For example, Working Washington organizers are doing their darndest to register every body and their dog to vote. Reminiscent of the infamous, now defunct ACORN group. Need I say more?? And the laugh is, the "Occupy" protesters still don't know for sure why they're there!! Is that a sign that the Organizers want them there, but really don't want them to know "why" they are? Isn't this a confusing conundrum? Keep them "disorganized" in their mind but "organized" with their boots on the ground!
Oh!! By the way, they're all connected to "Moveon.org", an Organization partially funded and commandeered by the Infamous George Soros, an Atheist billionaire originally from once "Nazi occupied" Hungary. It's said that as a teenager of Jewish decent, distributed deportation orders to other Jews during the Nazi occupation. He is suspected of making a lot of money by receiving "insider" Stock information from his leftist political friends in Congress.
Just sayin'.
read my blogs http:/macgeo1234.blogspot.com
I'm enlightened and pleased to discover an article in the Seattle times addressing the Occupy Seattle protesters, an arm of the Wall Street protesters in New York and affiliated protesters across the Nation.
Thank you, Seattle times for your honesty in reporting and exposing the real Community Organizers behind the movement. Considering you're based on the Left Coast, that had to be a "from the heart" decision to call it the way it is.
Many quotes from your article will be used in this blog.
As I have mentioned in my previous blogs, I suspected there was financial support supplied in their so-called phony "Grass roots"protesting.
Once a few Bums began looking for a free ride on Wall Street, The professional Community Organizers jumped into play, inspired by Barack Obama. On his behalf, I believe, The "volunteers" from Working Washington went door to dooring looking for more recruits to join the protests. They actually canvassed 100,000 homes to come up with a few hundred more protesters. They wouldn't have done very well selling Fuller Brush products, that's for sure!!
When the protests first began, they had signs made from Cardboard boxes with dislexic printing all over them. Corn flakes boxes, etc. Some of them wore the boxes on their heads when it rained. Most of them when asked, didn't even know why they were there!
Then the store printed signs began to show and the organizers began speaking on behalf of the protesters, with the likes of Michael Moore and Barney "buttbanger" Frank. Then "Doo Doo" Sharpton appeared on the scene. Three clowns at a make believe circus.
I must define the "Working Washington Group". Although they describe themselves as non-profit "Grass Roots", they aren't grass roots or non-profit. Working Washington is an arm of the Service Employees International Union.(SEIU). I don't know what's "working" about them if they don't have a job. Does the "Non-profit" part qualify them for a Grant or Waiver of some kind???
I mean, if the Socialists are looking for a grant, they'll be the ones that know how to get it out of Obama! It looks like "Working Washington" is supported by other groups as well, like labor and consumer groups, including the Teamster's Union and Washington Community Action network.
Talk about commingling, huh?
The Working Washington Group was behind the planned takeover of the University Bridge on Nov. 17th,along with recent demonstrations in Olympia. The Working Washington group is now planning to take over the "Occupy" protesters completely. They have what the Occupy protesters do not, money, organization skills and political shrewdness. For example, Working Washington organizers are doing their darndest to register every body and their dog to vote. Reminiscent of the infamous, now defunct ACORN group. Need I say more?? And the laugh is, the "Occupy" protesters still don't know for sure why they're there!! Is that a sign that the Organizers want them there, but really don't want them to know "why" they are? Isn't this a confusing conundrum? Keep them "disorganized" in their mind but "organized" with their boots on the ground!
Oh!! By the way, they're all connected to "Moveon.org", an Organization partially funded and commandeered by the Infamous George Soros, an Atheist billionaire originally from once "Nazi occupied" Hungary. It's said that as a teenager of Jewish decent, distributed deportation orders to other Jews during the Nazi occupation. He is suspected of making a lot of money by receiving "insider" Stock information from his leftist political friends in Congress.
Just sayin'.
WHY ARE WE ALWAYS SURPRISED WHEN SOMEONE WE KNOW IS NOW IN THEIR EIGHTIES?
Email me macgeo2345@hotmail.com
read my blogs http:/macgeo1234.blogspot.com
So why are we? Is it simply because they are? Is it because we want to get there too? Is it because we wonder if we will be? Or is it because we never stopped to think , in our busy past, about even getting that old? Or, as we get older and see the condition of some of our elders who are there already, do we ask ourselves if we even look forward to getting there?
Well......., It's all of the above for me. It's a "Damned if we do, and damned if we don't", situation, isn't it? Speaking solely for myself, I'll accept whatever is in store for me in the future, with the thought I could have done better, should have done better and, if I'm allowed the time, will continue to try to do better. I don't believe in casting the first stone, but sometimes wish I could get one in there!
I'm seventy five years old now, and have finally come to my own conclusions about whether there's a Supreme Being or a Hereafter. I believe there is, and with that in mind, I can more readily accept what's in store for me. In this way, I can hope for a continuation of Spiritual life in the future. It's my vision of "Peace of mind" while heading that way.
It allows me to forgive if I feel it's warranted, to forget if I can and look reality in the face with the realization there's something to look forward to in seeking the truth.
The truth is more serious now.
Sometimes the answers to questions are harsh, but that's the reality of it all. I won't allow myself to accept deception or half truths as a compromising way to "Kick the can down the road" for now. As it happens so often in today's Politics. I don't have enough breathing room for "Down the Road" intentions.
A problem needs to be solved at it's conception, not somewhere down the road. If the direction we are going is wrong, and we know it is, there should be no compromise in correcting it. There's should be no room for a half truth in solving a problem. Only the whole truth is acceptable. To me, this should apply to politics as well.
Forward to living in the Eighties , I would only like to be there, knowing I can still have the Godly freedom of declaring faith in God. Atheists would yank that out from under us if they could!
Would you believe God's philosophy is the right direction to follow, or should you follow the Atheists, some of whom hide behind the skirts of a chosen religion and call themselves "Socialists"?
To me, Socialism is the introduction to Marxism which in turn follows the philosophy of Atheism.
Their lack of belief in God allows for no conscience, no guilt, no fear of Spiritual punishment and nothing to look forward to in, or after, death. What a sad, boring future that is!! Not for me!!
The Atheist part of our Society is promoting an evil sense in their children and ours, in the respect that they have nothing to fear in the Ten Commandments,(which they never are taught), and the disobedience of our laws that are based on Godly beliefs. When I hear what a child has done to cause bodily harm or even kill someone, I refer to it as "The absence of God", and how could I be more truthful than that?
Socialism is deception in the manner of half truth. Compromise is a half truth in disguise when it comes to money, politics and religion. You can't buy a dollar for 50 cents, now can you?? No....!!
When you take Santa Clause or Christ out of Christmas, what's left to appreciate? It was never quite the same for me when I was told there was no Santa Clause.
When you take the music out of Instruments, what's left?
When you take Sanctity out of the joy of giving, what's left?
When you take the Lord out of the Lord's prayer, what's the point?
When an Atheist dies, who do they have to turn to? Nobody? That's a shame! Did they bring it on themselves? Most certainly. Will they always wonder why they did? I don't Know. Just like they'll never have proven there is no God!! One thing is for sure, though, I'm gonna believe just in case!
Taking God out our lives should not be an option for Atheists to attempt to do. When an Atheist carves a statue, or paints a painting, it's his or her privilege, but we don't have to look at it. If they want to express they are non-believers, which they do, we don't have to listen. They are by far a minority in this country, but the Constitution allows them to be.
So when they try to trample on our Constitutional rights to display a religious or holy inscription or to display the re-creation of Christ's birth, we should be able to do it. It's not violating their rights in any way. When an Atheist inspired Judge instructs us to compromise and remove it, he's a hypocrite in every sense of the word. He's protecting their Constitutional rights and denying ours. Does that make sense to you???
Since we haven't committed the first sin here, maybe we should cast the first stone!! Just sayin'.
read my blogs http:/macgeo1234.blogspot.com
So why are we? Is it simply because they are? Is it because we want to get there too? Is it because we wonder if we will be? Or is it because we never stopped to think , in our busy past, about even getting that old? Or, as we get older and see the condition of some of our elders who are there already, do we ask ourselves if we even look forward to getting there?
Well......., It's all of the above for me. It's a "Damned if we do, and damned if we don't", situation, isn't it? Speaking solely for myself, I'll accept whatever is in store for me in the future, with the thought I could have done better, should have done better and, if I'm allowed the time, will continue to try to do better. I don't believe in casting the first stone, but sometimes wish I could get one in there!
I'm seventy five years old now, and have finally come to my own conclusions about whether there's a Supreme Being or a Hereafter. I believe there is, and with that in mind, I can more readily accept what's in store for me. In this way, I can hope for a continuation of Spiritual life in the future. It's my vision of "Peace of mind" while heading that way.
It allows me to forgive if I feel it's warranted, to forget if I can and look reality in the face with the realization there's something to look forward to in seeking the truth.
The truth is more serious now.
Sometimes the answers to questions are harsh, but that's the reality of it all. I won't allow myself to accept deception or half truths as a compromising way to "Kick the can down the road" for now. As it happens so often in today's Politics. I don't have enough breathing room for "Down the Road" intentions.
A problem needs to be solved at it's conception, not somewhere down the road. If the direction we are going is wrong, and we know it is, there should be no compromise in correcting it. There's should be no room for a half truth in solving a problem. Only the whole truth is acceptable. To me, this should apply to politics as well.
Forward to living in the Eighties , I would only like to be there, knowing I can still have the Godly freedom of declaring faith in God. Atheists would yank that out from under us if they could!
Would you believe God's philosophy is the right direction to follow, or should you follow the Atheists, some of whom hide behind the skirts of a chosen religion and call themselves "Socialists"?
To me, Socialism is the introduction to Marxism which in turn follows the philosophy of Atheism.
Their lack of belief in God allows for no conscience, no guilt, no fear of Spiritual punishment and nothing to look forward to in, or after, death. What a sad, boring future that is!! Not for me!!
The Atheist part of our Society is promoting an evil sense in their children and ours, in the respect that they have nothing to fear in the Ten Commandments,(which they never are taught), and the disobedience of our laws that are based on Godly beliefs. When I hear what a child has done to cause bodily harm or even kill someone, I refer to it as "The absence of God", and how could I be more truthful than that?
Socialism is deception in the manner of half truth. Compromise is a half truth in disguise when it comes to money, politics and religion. You can't buy a dollar for 50 cents, now can you?? No....!!
When you take Santa Clause or Christ out of Christmas, what's left to appreciate? It was never quite the same for me when I was told there was no Santa Clause.
When you take the music out of Instruments, what's left?
When you take Sanctity out of the joy of giving, what's left?
When you take the Lord out of the Lord's prayer, what's the point?
When an Atheist dies, who do they have to turn to? Nobody? That's a shame! Did they bring it on themselves? Most certainly. Will they always wonder why they did? I don't Know. Just like they'll never have proven there is no God!! One thing is for sure, though, I'm gonna believe just in case!
Taking God out our lives should not be an option for Atheists to attempt to do. When an Atheist carves a statue, or paints a painting, it's his or her privilege, but we don't have to look at it. If they want to express they are non-believers, which they do, we don't have to listen. They are by far a minority in this country, but the Constitution allows them to be.
So when they try to trample on our Constitutional rights to display a religious or holy inscription or to display the re-creation of Christ's birth, we should be able to do it. It's not violating their rights in any way. When an Atheist inspired Judge instructs us to compromise and remove it, he's a hypocrite in every sense of the word. He's protecting their Constitutional rights and denying ours. Does that make sense to you???
Since we haven't committed the first sin here, maybe we should cast the first stone!! Just sayin'.
Saturday, December 10, 2011
CATERING TO THE SPECIAL INTEREST GROUPS. AREN"T THEY ALL THE SAME PEOPLE?
email me macgeo2345@hotmail.com
read my blogs http:/macgeo1234.blogspot.com
In trying to analyze why the "Special Interest" groups maintain such power in deciding how this country should be ran, it dawns on me that a lot of these groups are the same people wearing different hats, depending on what they wish to express on any given day.
They know that it works, to be as vocal as possible in their wishes, so they express themselves in a way they're going to be heard the most.
Commingling is the best way to describe it. An Anarchist is a union leader, is a Socialist, is a Teacher, is a
Homosexual, is a Community organizer, is an Environmentalist and is an Ecologist. By this I mean, one person can be all of these characters at a different meeting every week, 7 days a week. When you think of all these groups as a whole, You're imagining a lot of people, but in reality, they are the same small, close- knitted group of people. 10,000 members in one group can be the same 10,000 in another, and another, and another, and so on until they appear to amount to 70,000 voices when they really aren't.
But it works very effectively for them because they all make a lot of noise, but in different sequences. They all get special grants and privileges allowed for each organization. But many of them are the SAME people!! It works for them!!! They all present themselves as different organizations to the same Gov't Representative and he uses it as a large, collective bunch of Constituents. Neat,huh?? I wonder if he realizes he's looking at the same faces each time. As a Liberal, I'm sure he does, but after all, it's to his advantage don't you think?
So I'm suggesting this to the Tea Party. Form another group as the Coffee Party, the Gripewater Party, The Cool Aid Party, The Non Union Party, The Independent Party and the Republican Party, but hold different meetings in different places on different days of the week and all go as independent Groups at different times to the same Gov't Representative.
We'll call ourselves the "Magnificent Seven" Constitutionalist Party as an amalgamated political Society. We'l all demand the same tax breaks, same grants and the same special privileges.
Why not? If it works for them, it oughta work for us??? We'll make a bunch more noise and maybe get Obama Healthcare waivers as well. Whadaya think??
Yeah, yeah, I know this sounds a little absurd! But it shines a different light on the tail wagging the dog, doesn't it? Just sayin'.
read my blogs http:/macgeo1234.blogspot.com
In trying to analyze why the "Special Interest" groups maintain such power in deciding how this country should be ran, it dawns on me that a lot of these groups are the same people wearing different hats, depending on what they wish to express on any given day.
They know that it works, to be as vocal as possible in their wishes, so they express themselves in a way they're going to be heard the most.
Commingling is the best way to describe it. An Anarchist is a union leader, is a Socialist, is a Teacher, is a
Homosexual, is a Community organizer, is an Environmentalist and is an Ecologist. By this I mean, one person can be all of these characters at a different meeting every week, 7 days a week. When you think of all these groups as a whole, You're imagining a lot of people, but in reality, they are the same small, close- knitted group of people. 10,000 members in one group can be the same 10,000 in another, and another, and another, and so on until they appear to amount to 70,000 voices when they really aren't.
But it works very effectively for them because they all make a lot of noise, but in different sequences. They all get special grants and privileges allowed for each organization. But many of them are the SAME people!! It works for them!!! They all present themselves as different organizations to the same Gov't Representative and he uses it as a large, collective bunch of Constituents. Neat,huh?? I wonder if he realizes he's looking at the same faces each time. As a Liberal, I'm sure he does, but after all, it's to his advantage don't you think?
So I'm suggesting this to the Tea Party. Form another group as the Coffee Party, the Gripewater Party, The Cool Aid Party, The Non Union Party, The Independent Party and the Republican Party, but hold different meetings in different places on different days of the week and all go as independent Groups at different times to the same Gov't Representative.
We'll call ourselves the "Magnificent Seven" Constitutionalist Party as an amalgamated political Society. We'l all demand the same tax breaks, same grants and the same special privileges.
Why not? If it works for them, it oughta work for us??? We'll make a bunch more noise and maybe get Obama Healthcare waivers as well. Whadaya think??
Yeah, yeah, I know this sounds a little absurd! But it shines a different light on the tail wagging the dog, doesn't it? Just sayin'.
Thursday, December 8, 2011
THE DRONE (Cont'd from "the drone in Iran")
email me macgeo2345@hotmail.com
Read my blog http:/macgeo1234.blogspot.com
Having followed politics and the internal affairs of Gov't only for the last couple of decades, and not as close as I should have prior to that, I'm having to do a lot of research into the past. I do this because I like to be as accurate as I can in my latest hobby of writing blogs.
I do this because I can blow off steam sometimes, other times because I'm concerned about the country's affairs and the rest of the time to entertain myself with subjects that are interesting to me and maybe to whoever reads my blogs. It's often referred to by me as "a flare for the pen".
I really do try to understand other people's views, as well as voicing my own.
Maybe it's just me, but as I look at the politics of old, I see a change in the behavior of Presidents and their staff, compared to the way it used to be. Maybe I was just uninformed and naive enough to not see it happening before, but I notice a behavior by the last two Democratic Presidents that wasn't noticeable to me before. A total disregard and disrespect for our Constitution and Bill of Rights.
There was and is, a display of total contempt for what the citizens of this country desire as a whole, by both of these Presidents. Before Clinton, There seemed to be at least on the surface, a show of patriotism and respect for each other in the Congress. They generally abided by the rules of the Constitution and Bill of Rights. Believe it or not, we as common folks used to be able to surmise what the Supreme Court would decide in a case because of it's relativity to those two "Sacred Documents". The Congressmen displayed mutual respect for each other, at least when in the public eye. Not so much, anymore.
Bill Clinton certainly turned the page on that, with his sometimes perverted sexual behavior and openness to making advances toward women without caring much about the Sanctity of his role as President and Commander in Chief.
His complete ignorance concerning the Military "Might" this country maintained over the years that kept us, and the rest of the free world safe from aggressive harm, was apparent and he nor his Administration cared. His history as a Draft dodger seemed to go unnoticed, and the way the military secrets were allowed to flow out of the country to what we considered adversaries was disgraceful.
His intention was to supply secrets to them in a way he felt would balance the power in the modern world. His twisted philosophy was such that he thought, along with his "Peace-nick" administration, if the balance of Nuclear war capabilities was more evenly balanced, there would be a lesser chance of war. China's one country that benefited from it, then North Korea. Bill Richardson, who was the Secretary of Energy at the time could share some of the blame too. They stood silently by as the Chinese Ambassador, Mr. Lee, helped himself to top secrets right out of the Pentagon for years. China sprinted forward in Long range missile development as a result. Then passed it on to N. Korea. Are we feeling safer now???
I suspect Clinton's advice was well taken in the decision by Obama to not destroy the Drone captured by Iran. I will always wonder whether it was accidentally, or intentionally sent to them. after all, money can buy anything and that doesn't exclude Barack Obama. The Pentagon issued three requests for permission to destroy the drone, but Obama refused each time, saying it was too dangerous. I ask, dangerous to who? There's gotta be big money in selling military secrets!
Now he's making Clinton look like an amateur in comparison. Just look at the thugs he has placed in his charge, for goodness sake!
I never realized a President and his Cohorts could behave the way they do, with Congress not doing anything about it but standing back and wringing their hands.
We're learning a costly and unfortunate lesson from this guy, and it may be one we'll never get over in some respects. All of his actions and behavior are from a man who never respected this country for one day in his life. His wife expressed the same feelings as well, by saying in a speech,"I never thought I'd see the day when I would be proud this country."
Thank God the American people are smarter than he gives them credit for. If I can see through him,
I'm sure they can too, but it's gonna take some time to straighten it out after he's voted out of office.
Just sayin'.
Read my blog http:/macgeo1234.blogspot.com
Having followed politics and the internal affairs of Gov't only for the last couple of decades, and not as close as I should have prior to that, I'm having to do a lot of research into the past. I do this because I like to be as accurate as I can in my latest hobby of writing blogs.
I do this because I can blow off steam sometimes, other times because I'm concerned about the country's affairs and the rest of the time to entertain myself with subjects that are interesting to me and maybe to whoever reads my blogs. It's often referred to by me as "a flare for the pen".
I really do try to understand other people's views, as well as voicing my own.
Maybe it's just me, but as I look at the politics of old, I see a change in the behavior of Presidents and their staff, compared to the way it used to be. Maybe I was just uninformed and naive enough to not see it happening before, but I notice a behavior by the last two Democratic Presidents that wasn't noticeable to me before. A total disregard and disrespect for our Constitution and Bill of Rights.
There was and is, a display of total contempt for what the citizens of this country desire as a whole, by both of these Presidents. Before Clinton, There seemed to be at least on the surface, a show of patriotism and respect for each other in the Congress. They generally abided by the rules of the Constitution and Bill of Rights. Believe it or not, we as common folks used to be able to surmise what the Supreme Court would decide in a case because of it's relativity to those two "Sacred Documents". The Congressmen displayed mutual respect for each other, at least when in the public eye. Not so much, anymore.
Bill Clinton certainly turned the page on that, with his sometimes perverted sexual behavior and openness to making advances toward women without caring much about the Sanctity of his role as President and Commander in Chief.
His complete ignorance concerning the Military "Might" this country maintained over the years that kept us, and the rest of the free world safe from aggressive harm, was apparent and he nor his Administration cared. His history as a Draft dodger seemed to go unnoticed, and the way the military secrets were allowed to flow out of the country to what we considered adversaries was disgraceful.
His intention was to supply secrets to them in a way he felt would balance the power in the modern world. His twisted philosophy was such that he thought, along with his "Peace-nick" administration, if the balance of Nuclear war capabilities was more evenly balanced, there would be a lesser chance of war. China's one country that benefited from it, then North Korea. Bill Richardson, who was the Secretary of Energy at the time could share some of the blame too. They stood silently by as the Chinese Ambassador, Mr. Lee, helped himself to top secrets right out of the Pentagon for years. China sprinted forward in Long range missile development as a result. Then passed it on to N. Korea. Are we feeling safer now???
I suspect Clinton's advice was well taken in the decision by Obama to not destroy the Drone captured by Iran. I will always wonder whether it was accidentally, or intentionally sent to them. after all, money can buy anything and that doesn't exclude Barack Obama. The Pentagon issued three requests for permission to destroy the drone, but Obama refused each time, saying it was too dangerous. I ask, dangerous to who? There's gotta be big money in selling military secrets!
Now he's making Clinton look like an amateur in comparison. Just look at the thugs he has placed in his charge, for goodness sake!
I never realized a President and his Cohorts could behave the way they do, with Congress not doing anything about it but standing back and wringing their hands.
We're learning a costly and unfortunate lesson from this guy, and it may be one we'll never get over in some respects. All of his actions and behavior are from a man who never respected this country for one day in his life. His wife expressed the same feelings as well, by saying in a speech,"I never thought I'd see the day when I would be proud this country."
Thank God the American people are smarter than he gives them credit for. If I can see through him,
I'm sure they can too, but it's gonna take some time to straighten it out after he's voted out of office.
Just sayin'.
Wednesday, December 7, 2011
ROD BLAGOJEVICH SENTENCED TO 14 YEARS. SACRIFICIAL LAMB??
email me macgeo2345@hotmail.com
read my blogs http:/macgeo1234.blogspot.com
Blagojevich gets caught trying to make a little money on the sale of Obama's vacated Senate seat. His phone was tapped while doing this. He gets convicted and receives 14 years in jail. Perfect! No objection. Guess where he originates from? Chicago politics!!
Personally, I think the Obama group of Chicago thugs felt he was a loose cannon in their midst and saw it best to railroad him. They saw him as a wanna-be with a loose mouth.
He was the Governor of the infamous State of Illinois, right? Well.....in my previous blog, I pointed out that Obama and the Cronies he appointed, are all from Chicago, Illinois. Duh!!!
What's wrong with this picture?? Blagojevich gets 14 years in "The Big House", while Obama gets 4 years in "The White House" for lying over a microphone that he's gonna get rid of this Recession. In fact the guy lies everytime he steps in front of a microphone. He didn't sell his Senate seat, but he sold the whole Nation down the river in his speeches to the U.N. and the European Union. In so doing, he also sold his soul, as far as this Nation is concerned.
What do you think? Should we pass a law that every Democratic politician coming out of Illinois should spend a year in jail just for wanting to be in Federal politics. Ha, ha!
Sorry about that, Blago. Looks like you got caught up with the wrong thugs. No honor among thieves here!
Barack's partner in crime, Jon Corzine, is now in the hot seat. He just made 1.2 billion dollars completely disappear from the now bankrupt MF Global. He doesn't have any idea where it went! This money is from private investors who will never retrieve it. In case you don't know, Corzine is an ex-Democratic Governor of New Jersey, a former CEO of Goldman Sachs who incidentally received a big lump of bailout money for supporting Obama, and current CEO of MF Global.
It's done gone, man! That money's gonna buy a lot of silence! In fact, you can hear a pin drop in the halls of the Socialist Media. I'm listening! Just sayin'.
read my blogs http:/macgeo1234.blogspot.com
Blagojevich gets caught trying to make a little money on the sale of Obama's vacated Senate seat. His phone was tapped while doing this. He gets convicted and receives 14 years in jail. Perfect! No objection. Guess where he originates from? Chicago politics!!
Personally, I think the Obama group of Chicago thugs felt he was a loose cannon in their midst and saw it best to railroad him. They saw him as a wanna-be with a loose mouth.
He was the Governor of the infamous State of Illinois, right? Well.....in my previous blog, I pointed out that Obama and the Cronies he appointed, are all from Chicago, Illinois. Duh!!!
What's wrong with this picture?? Blagojevich gets 14 years in "The Big House", while Obama gets 4 years in "The White House" for lying over a microphone that he's gonna get rid of this Recession. In fact the guy lies everytime he steps in front of a microphone. He didn't sell his Senate seat, but he sold the whole Nation down the river in his speeches to the U.N. and the European Union. In so doing, he also sold his soul, as far as this Nation is concerned.
What do you think? Should we pass a law that every Democratic politician coming out of Illinois should spend a year in jail just for wanting to be in Federal politics. Ha, ha!
Sorry about that, Blago. Looks like you got caught up with the wrong thugs. No honor among thieves here!
Barack's partner in crime, Jon Corzine, is now in the hot seat. He just made 1.2 billion dollars completely disappear from the now bankrupt MF Global. He doesn't have any idea where it went! This money is from private investors who will never retrieve it. In case you don't know, Corzine is an ex-Democratic Governor of New Jersey, a former CEO of Goldman Sachs who incidentally received a big lump of bailout money for supporting Obama, and current CEO of MF Global.
It's done gone, man! That money's gonna buy a lot of silence! In fact, you can hear a pin drop in the halls of the Socialist Media. I'm listening! Just sayin'.
THE 2012 FEDERAL ELECTION, CAN IT BE BOUGHT? "YES"
email me macgeo2345@hotmail.com
read my blogs http:/macgeo1234.blogspot.com
In my opinion,
Can the Federal election, with all of it's massive amount of Media attention, be solely bought with money alone, regardless of votes? The answer is,......"YES"! Barack Obama intends to do exactly that. His objective is 100% money. He knows if he can amass enough money, he can accomplish achieving another 4 years in office. He recognizes there's no way he can honestly get re-elected.
He was raised and schooled that way. He graduated from a Chicago University and in a corrupt, "Chicago" way of doing business. It is an area not different from "Al Capone" days in the thirties up until the present, with It's current Mayor being Raul Emanuel.
Chicago has a history of corrupt politics and Mayors.
Raul Emanuel was Barack Obama's notorious White house Chief of staff until his scandalous decisions caused him to make a break for it when the opportunity came to run for Mayor of Chicago.
He also is a product of corrupt Chicago politics, and a personal friend of Barack Obama's. While in office, he was accused of harassing other opposition members in the facility showers that all members can use if they wish to. He seriously didn't care if he was naked or not! It was described as bizarre by other onlookers.
Eric Holder, the now infamous U.S. Attorney General about to face charges of involvement in the gun running deals with the two opposing Mexican Drug Cartels, is struggling for his own political life right now. He's also a friend of Obama's and a graduate from the corrupt Chicago politics. Cozy arrangement, isn't it?
My point here is, to them, it's totally 100% about money. Morals, compassion and truth have been tossed by the wayside if in fact they ever started out with any in the first place. "IT"S ALL ABOUT MONEY"!!!
With all of his ratings headed down hill, Obama has no other choice but to "buy" his way back into a 2nd term. A second term will allow him the possible opportunity to cover up all the bone headed blunders he has made so far. The AFSCME, American Federation of State, County and Municipal Employees Unions has announced a contribution of 100 mil. to his campaign alone in exchange for grants, waivers from his new rules, and tax breaks that will come from the I.R.S. under the command of, you guessed it, Timothy Geithner, U.S.Secretary of the Treasury, another personal friend.
Tim was caught evading personal taxes in 2007 to the tune of $150,000.00. He paid it, and then was placed in charge of the I.R.S. by Obama. Can you believe it??? All the while with the approval of both the House of Representatives and the Senate. Democrats held control of both Groups at the time.
With his goal of achieving 1 billion dollars for his re-election bid, he will buy whomever or whatever he wants to in order to become President for a 2nd term. If he makes it, Look out!!
Buying votes with his Union money, tax money and China's loaned stimulus money, he could do it. One thing I can guarantee you for sure, He'll pull out all the stops!
When he does leave, whenever that may be, I predict he and his Cronies will be the Richest people ever to leave the White house Grounds. It may take a while to learn this, because of the way they retrieve it, but I suspect it'll be true. Just sayin'.
read my blogs http:/macgeo1234.blogspot.com
In my opinion,
Can the Federal election, with all of it's massive amount of Media attention, be solely bought with money alone, regardless of votes? The answer is,......"YES"! Barack Obama intends to do exactly that. His objective is 100% money. He knows if he can amass enough money, he can accomplish achieving another 4 years in office. He recognizes there's no way he can honestly get re-elected.
He was raised and schooled that way. He graduated from a Chicago University and in a corrupt, "Chicago" way of doing business. It is an area not different from "Al Capone" days in the thirties up until the present, with It's current Mayor being Raul Emanuel.
Chicago has a history of corrupt politics and Mayors.
Raul Emanuel was Barack Obama's notorious White house Chief of staff until his scandalous decisions caused him to make a break for it when the opportunity came to run for Mayor of Chicago.
He also is a product of corrupt Chicago politics, and a personal friend of Barack Obama's. While in office, he was accused of harassing other opposition members in the facility showers that all members can use if they wish to. He seriously didn't care if he was naked or not! It was described as bizarre by other onlookers.
Eric Holder, the now infamous U.S. Attorney General about to face charges of involvement in the gun running deals with the two opposing Mexican Drug Cartels, is struggling for his own political life right now. He's also a friend of Obama's and a graduate from the corrupt Chicago politics. Cozy arrangement, isn't it?
My point here is, to them, it's totally 100% about money. Morals, compassion and truth have been tossed by the wayside if in fact they ever started out with any in the first place. "IT"S ALL ABOUT MONEY"!!!
With all of his ratings headed down hill, Obama has no other choice but to "buy" his way back into a 2nd term. A second term will allow him the possible opportunity to cover up all the bone headed blunders he has made so far. The AFSCME, American Federation of State, County and Municipal Employees Unions has announced a contribution of 100 mil. to his campaign alone in exchange for grants, waivers from his new rules, and tax breaks that will come from the I.R.S. under the command of, you guessed it, Timothy Geithner, U.S.Secretary of the Treasury, another personal friend.
Tim was caught evading personal taxes in 2007 to the tune of $150,000.00. He paid it, and then was placed in charge of the I.R.S. by Obama. Can you believe it??? All the while with the approval of both the House of Representatives and the Senate. Democrats held control of both Groups at the time.
With his goal of achieving 1 billion dollars for his re-election bid, he will buy whomever or whatever he wants to in order to become President for a 2nd term. If he makes it, Look out!!
Buying votes with his Union money, tax money and China's loaned stimulus money, he could do it. One thing I can guarantee you for sure, He'll pull out all the stops!
When he does leave, whenever that may be, I predict he and his Cronies will be the Richest people ever to leave the White house Grounds. It may take a while to learn this, because of the way they retrieve it, but I suspect it'll be true. Just sayin'.
Tuesday, December 6, 2011
IN THE MOOD FOR A POEM.
email me macgeo2345@hotmail.com
Read my blogs http:/macgeo1234.blogspot.com
I want people who are sick to get better
I want kids to be tucked into bed
I'd like folks who are cold get a sweater
I want folks with no food to be fed
Most of all I want peace in my country
There shouldn't be riots and such
In our hearts there'd be answers aplenty
Our thoughts wouldn't haunt us so much
God often tries giving assistance
for things we can get if we try
He looks down at us from a distance
I'm sure he must break down and cry!
George McNaughton2
Read my blogs http:/macgeo1234.blogspot.com
I want people who are sick to get better
I want kids to be tucked into bed
I'd like folks who are cold get a sweater
I want folks with no food to be fed
Most of all I want peace in my country
There shouldn't be riots and such
In our hearts there'd be answers aplenty
Our thoughts wouldn't haunt us so much
God often tries giving assistance
for things we can get if we try
He looks down at us from a distance
I'm sure he must break down and cry!
George McNaughton2
THE DRONE IN IRAN. WHY WASN"T IT DESTROYED BY US?? A SIMPLE DEDUCTION!
email me macgeo2345@hotmail.com
read my blogs http:/macgeo1234.blogspot.com
In the News this morning, the report has come down that a Drone was "airnapped" by the Iranians in Iran. Are you kidding me???? No self destruct devices aboard this thing? With all our fancy technology aboard, and it being the most advanced drone ever developed, they couldn't have had the common sense to destroy it? Couldn't they still? B.S.!!!
A disabled helicopter gets abandoned in the secretive, well planned, well executed surgical strike on Osama Bin Laden's hidden away compound in Pakistan. Again, equipped with the latest, most advanced technology aboard as well? No capability to self destruct? B.S.!!!
North Korea comes up with Nuclear missile capabilities acquired mysteriouly on Obama's watch. B.S.!!!
Iran comes up with the latest Nuclear technology mysteriously on Obama's watch. B.S.!!!
They since have rapidly developed nuclear missile deliverance technology capable of destroying Israel,
again on Obama's watch. B.S.!!!
Mexican Drug Cartels come up with illegal guns sold to them by our own Obama Administration and then murder two of our own Border Agents with them. B.S.!!!
The Justice Dept.'s Eric Holder refuses to apologize to the Agent's relatives for it. B.S.!!!
Shortly after, Obama pardons seven drug traffickers by Executive order with no apparent explanation. B.S.!!!
Barack Obama encourages the Libyan revolt, just for us to see them come under the control of Al Quaida inspired Extremists. They invoked Shariah Law. B.S.!!!
The overthrow of Egypt, coming under Shariah Law witnessed innocently by Obama. B.S.!!!
The U.S. having the naivety to elect an Islamic inspired President raised in an Islamic country like Indonesia and claiming to be converted to Christianity. B.S.!!!
A man who Community organized a notorious, totally corrupt group called "Acorn" only for it to be dismantled due to it's dishonest and illegal voting practices. B.S.!!!
Is the forest so thick you can't see it for the trees? This guy's a Muslim from day #1 and remains so. Christianity and Socialism is just one more disguise closer to what he's really trying to achieve. It's called total control, and he has no intention of backing off from it.
Ground that airplane called "Air Force One" folks, before he flies all of the trillions we owe out of the country!!! It can carry a whole lot of stuff, and he's made a lot of trips already.
Can you imagine another nightmarish 4 years of this fella? Just sayin'.
read my blogs http:/macgeo1234.blogspot.com
In the News this morning, the report has come down that a Drone was "airnapped" by the Iranians in Iran. Are you kidding me???? No self destruct devices aboard this thing? With all our fancy technology aboard, and it being the most advanced drone ever developed, they couldn't have had the common sense to destroy it? Couldn't they still? B.S.!!!
A disabled helicopter gets abandoned in the secretive, well planned, well executed surgical strike on Osama Bin Laden's hidden away compound in Pakistan. Again, equipped with the latest, most advanced technology aboard as well? No capability to self destruct? B.S.!!!
North Korea comes up with Nuclear missile capabilities acquired mysteriouly on Obama's watch. B.S.!!!
Iran comes up with the latest Nuclear technology mysteriously on Obama's watch. B.S.!!!
They since have rapidly developed nuclear missile deliverance technology capable of destroying Israel,
again on Obama's watch. B.S.!!!
Mexican Drug Cartels come up with illegal guns sold to them by our own Obama Administration and then murder two of our own Border Agents with them. B.S.!!!
The Justice Dept.'s Eric Holder refuses to apologize to the Agent's relatives for it. B.S.!!!
Shortly after, Obama pardons seven drug traffickers by Executive order with no apparent explanation. B.S.!!!
Barack Obama encourages the Libyan revolt, just for us to see them come under the control of Al Quaida inspired Extremists. They invoked Shariah Law. B.S.!!!
The overthrow of Egypt, coming under Shariah Law witnessed innocently by Obama. B.S.!!!
The U.S. having the naivety to elect an Islamic inspired President raised in an Islamic country like Indonesia and claiming to be converted to Christianity. B.S.!!!
A man who Community organized a notorious, totally corrupt group called "Acorn" only for it to be dismantled due to it's dishonest and illegal voting practices. B.S.!!!
Is the forest so thick you can't see it for the trees? This guy's a Muslim from day #1 and remains so. Christianity and Socialism is just one more disguise closer to what he's really trying to achieve. It's called total control, and he has no intention of backing off from it.
Ground that airplane called "Air Force One" folks, before he flies all of the trillions we owe out of the country!!! It can carry a whole lot of stuff, and he's made a lot of trips already.
Can you imagine another nightmarish 4 years of this fella? Just sayin'.
Sunday, December 4, 2011
EVERYONE IS ALWAYS ENTITLED TO MY HONEST OPINION! #1
email me macgeo2345@hotmail.com
read my blogs http:/macgeo1234.blogspot.com
With all the campaign infighting going on with the Candidates for the Republican nomination to run for the Presidency in 2012, the commentators at Fox News, I think, are sometimes doing more harm to the contestants than good. In this case I'm referring to the term "baggage" they're so loosely throwing out there for the Democratic/Socialists to salivate on. They love the word as long as it pertains to a Republican candidate. I'm afraid too many people are confusing it with the word "garbage". Particularly in reference to Newt Gingrich. It's unfair to refer to his past with a general description such as that. Overall, Newt has lived a life of peaceful, eventful and appreciable existence. Few will ever achieve what he has done. As a Historian, he is one of the best, especially in the history of politics. His divorces of the past are really just an everyday occurrence in everyone else's life, but his are considered "baggage". Some of his political decisions may be questionable, but certainly not out of the ordinary.
I appreciate a person when he or she acknowledges mistakes, rather than denies them. If were're asking him to be honest about his past, I think he already has. Maybe we should all think about doing that. He's been out there in the limelight for everyone to see most of his entire adult life.
In all their intended sincerity, the Conservative commentators are as usual, playing right into the slippery hands of the Illusive Liberal/Socialists, who couldn't get a straight story if their children's lives depended on it. I mean, those who are straight enough to make love to the opposite sex!
The hypocrites voted in Barney "Buttbanger"Frank for 30 years to the House of Representatives,all the while knowing he was a perverted homosexual who incidentally, allowed his homosexual lover to run a house of male prostitution out of their own home. That wasn't baggage my friends, it is true, stinky Garbage!!!
For that man to have been in the same room with Newt Gingrich is like having a full, smelly garbage truck sitting next to the Queen's limousine!
Please, Please stop the "baggage" thing! It doesn't fit. Just sayin'.
read my blogs http:/macgeo1234.blogspot.com
With all the campaign infighting going on with the Candidates for the Republican nomination to run for the Presidency in 2012, the commentators at Fox News, I think, are sometimes doing more harm to the contestants than good. In this case I'm referring to the term "baggage" they're so loosely throwing out there for the Democratic/Socialists to salivate on. They love the word as long as it pertains to a Republican candidate. I'm afraid too many people are confusing it with the word "garbage". Particularly in reference to Newt Gingrich. It's unfair to refer to his past with a general description such as that. Overall, Newt has lived a life of peaceful, eventful and appreciable existence. Few will ever achieve what he has done. As a Historian, he is one of the best, especially in the history of politics. His divorces of the past are really just an everyday occurrence in everyone else's life, but his are considered "baggage". Some of his political decisions may be questionable, but certainly not out of the ordinary.
I appreciate a person when he or she acknowledges mistakes, rather than denies them. If were're asking him to be honest about his past, I think he already has. Maybe we should all think about doing that. He's been out there in the limelight for everyone to see most of his entire adult life.
In all their intended sincerity, the Conservative commentators are as usual, playing right into the slippery hands of the Illusive Liberal/Socialists, who couldn't get a straight story if their children's lives depended on it. I mean, those who are straight enough to make love to the opposite sex!
The hypocrites voted in Barney "Buttbanger"Frank for 30 years to the House of Representatives,all the while knowing he was a perverted homosexual who incidentally, allowed his homosexual lover to run a house of male prostitution out of their own home. That wasn't baggage my friends, it is true, stinky Garbage!!!
For that man to have been in the same room with Newt Gingrich is like having a full, smelly garbage truck sitting next to the Queen's limousine!
Please, Please stop the "baggage" thing! It doesn't fit. Just sayin'.
"INSIDER TRADING" IN CONGRESS. TELL ME IT AIN"T SO!!
email me macgeo2345@hotmail.com
read my blogs http:/macgeo1234.blogspot.com
Over the years, I, along with many others, have always wondered why a successful business owner in his own right would want to run for Congress. Especially when the income would be substantially lower than what they would normally receive if they stayed in private business. Well,,,,, now we may know shortly.
Up until now, there have been laws established against "Insider trading" in stocks that are available to inside investors in the public Stock market. People have been jailed for years because of this. House Representative Jim McDermott, (D) has recently been criticized for doing just that.
The laws are simply to protect the outside investors from being taken advantage of by the Prime owners or appointed officers of the same company. Such as knowing or foreseeing a happening in the market that's going to affect the raising or lowering of their investor's stock values.
The law requires the Owners and Officers to reveal that information to the outside investors before
taking trading action on their own stocks.
It appears that the Congress members have not been required to follow the same rules when it comes to knowledge obtained within the Congressional grasp, but hasn't yet been revealed to the constituents. It seems they have been enhancing their private investments with knowledge that benefits
their investments before it reaches the public. i.e. Al Gore's Global warming Scandal that allowed him to manipulate the truth about it to his own benefit of hundreds of millions of dollars may be one example.
I believe it's only because of a Democratic control of Congress that's prevented all the truths concerning Al Gore to be made public. It's often referred to as "The Great Global Warming Swindle", as previously described by a well known N.W. Blogger by the name of Buck Compton. He had the Socialists pegged for years.
Thanks to the Freshman Congressmen to Washington, D.C., laws will be passed shortly prohibiting this kind of thing that by the way, brings a new meaning to the term"Washington Insiders".
So now we are beginning to know! Just sayin'.
read my blogs http:/macgeo1234.blogspot.com
Over the years, I, along with many others, have always wondered why a successful business owner in his own right would want to run for Congress. Especially when the income would be substantially lower than what they would normally receive if they stayed in private business. Well,,,,, now we may know shortly.
Up until now, there have been laws established against "Insider trading" in stocks that are available to inside investors in the public Stock market. People have been jailed for years because of this. House Representative Jim McDermott, (D) has recently been criticized for doing just that.
The laws are simply to protect the outside investors from being taken advantage of by the Prime owners or appointed officers of the same company. Such as knowing or foreseeing a happening in the market that's going to affect the raising or lowering of their investor's stock values.
The law requires the Owners and Officers to reveal that information to the outside investors before
taking trading action on their own stocks.
It appears that the Congress members have not been required to follow the same rules when it comes to knowledge obtained within the Congressional grasp, but hasn't yet been revealed to the constituents. It seems they have been enhancing their private investments with knowledge that benefits
their investments before it reaches the public. i.e. Al Gore's Global warming Scandal that allowed him to manipulate the truth about it to his own benefit of hundreds of millions of dollars may be one example.
I believe it's only because of a Democratic control of Congress that's prevented all the truths concerning Al Gore to be made public. It's often referred to as "The Great Global Warming Swindle", as previously described by a well known N.W. Blogger by the name of Buck Compton. He had the Socialists pegged for years.
Thanks to the Freshman Congressmen to Washington, D.C., laws will be passed shortly prohibiting this kind of thing that by the way, brings a new meaning to the term"Washington Insiders".
So now we are beginning to know! Just sayin'.
Saturday, December 3, 2011
THE ANGELIC LOOK OF A SLEEPING CHILD.
Email me macgeo2345@hotmail.com
Read my blogs http:/macgeo1234.blogspot.com
The angelic look of a sleeping child, a puppy, a kitten or any other warm blooded, newborn animal.
Isn't it a beautiful sight? I'm sure I'm not alone, when I say it has a heart melting affect on this guy. I'm convinced that a higher Power arranged us that way. It's gotta be! It's the look of loving innocence from someone who didn't ask to be here, is totally dependent on us all to help, to feed, to hug and last but not least,love with all your God given being.
Anything less just doesn't do! It's a miracle of birth and anyone who thinks of it in a lesser way is missing out on a whole lot of love in their life, don't you think?
I don't need pictures to remember how every one of my children looked when they were sleeping. I always felt when I gazed at them, or any other sleeping child, that they were being watched over by someone heavenly. I know they were too, no doubt in my mind.
If I wanted to go to bed with peace of mind, I only had to view my children first, regardless of any other problems that existed, I could sleep. knowing they were in the secure presence of the Sandman, who, in my thinking, was God's Angel of sleep. All children should have one.
We have another new Grandchild in our life to love now, and seeing her sleeping face on Facebook tonight hit the soft spot in me. None of us are ever too old to love little babies, I guess. Just sayin'.
Read my blogs http:/macgeo1234.blogspot.com
The angelic look of a sleeping child, a puppy, a kitten or any other warm blooded, newborn animal.
Isn't it a beautiful sight? I'm sure I'm not alone, when I say it has a heart melting affect on this guy. I'm convinced that a higher Power arranged us that way. It's gotta be! It's the look of loving innocence from someone who didn't ask to be here, is totally dependent on us all to help, to feed, to hug and last but not least,love with all your God given being.
Anything less just doesn't do! It's a miracle of birth and anyone who thinks of it in a lesser way is missing out on a whole lot of love in their life, don't you think?
I don't need pictures to remember how every one of my children looked when they were sleeping. I always felt when I gazed at them, or any other sleeping child, that they were being watched over by someone heavenly. I know they were too, no doubt in my mind.
If I wanted to go to bed with peace of mind, I only had to view my children first, regardless of any other problems that existed, I could sleep. knowing they were in the secure presence of the Sandman, who, in my thinking, was God's Angel of sleep. All children should have one.
We have another new Grandchild in our life to love now, and seeing her sleeping face on Facebook tonight hit the soft spot in me. None of us are ever too old to love little babies, I guess. Just sayin'.
Thursday, December 1, 2011
LET"S GET SOMETHING STRAIGHT! BUSH DIDN"T DO IT! OBAMA, FRANK AND DODD DID!!
email me macgeo2345@hotmail.com
read my blogs http:/maqcgeo1234.blogspot.com
In the past year, the Socialists and particularly Barack Obama, Barney Frank and Chris Dodd have been placing the blame for the downfall of the Housing Fiasco on George W. Bush. Some disinformed Conservatives have been conceding that it does go back to the Bush Presidency. It really does not, if you were to know the facts the way I know them now.
On January 3rd, 2007, while President Bush was in his last year of the Presidency, the Democrats took over control of both the House of Representatives and the Senate. That gave control of the House to Nancy Pelosi as Speaker and Harry Reid as Senate Majority Leader. At the same time, Democrat Barney Frank took control of the House of Financial Services, in charge of the affairs of Fannie Mae.
Christopher Dodd also took over the Senate Banking Committee in charge of Freddie mac.
This also was the time when the minority Republicans no longer had any say in the matter.
The unrelenting, uncompromising House and Senate set out to show the Electorate how they were going to whip this Country into their idea of order. Let me give you the condition of affairs at exactly that point in time.
George Bush's Economic policies had just set a record of 52 straight months of job growth in Private Industry.
The Dow Jones was at a modest 12.621.77
G.D.P. for the last Quarter was at 3.5 %
Unemployment was at 4.6 %.
After 15 months of Obama and Democratic control, the economic meltdown occurred with the Democrats dumping upwards of 6 trillion dollars into toxic,risky loans to keep the foolish Lenders afloat and threatening the very heart of this country's financial system.
Starting back in 2001, President Bush foresaw the problem starting and warned Congress and the Lending Industry to stop the risky loans. He warned the Democratic controlled Congress 16 more times
before leaving office. Barney Frank blocked his proposal, calling it a "Chicken Little" philosophy.
Congress controlled the money all the while, not President Bush! They also controlled the budget.
Remember who was a member of the Senate at the time these spending bills were passed. Barack Obama. He gave his approval to every one of them, before he became President.
Who fought against reform of Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac during this risky lending spree?
Barack Obama, Chris Dodd and Barney Frank. Who received the 3rd highest pay-off from those crippled Institutions? Barack Obama.
Barack Obama as a Senator, voted for the very deficit he inherited as a President and profited from it as well! What??? And he's trying to pass it off on President Bush?
The Conservative contributors would be well advised to quit conceding that the problem started during the Bush days and start referring to it as the Socialist takeover days. The Socialists don't need any more concessions, friends, they've already granted themselves enough! Just sayin'.
read my blogs http:/maqcgeo1234.blogspot.com
In the past year, the Socialists and particularly Barack Obama, Barney Frank and Chris Dodd have been placing the blame for the downfall of the Housing Fiasco on George W. Bush. Some disinformed Conservatives have been conceding that it does go back to the Bush Presidency. It really does not, if you were to know the facts the way I know them now.
On January 3rd, 2007, while President Bush was in his last year of the Presidency, the Democrats took over control of both the House of Representatives and the Senate. That gave control of the House to Nancy Pelosi as Speaker and Harry Reid as Senate Majority Leader. At the same time, Democrat Barney Frank took control of the House of Financial Services, in charge of the affairs of Fannie Mae.
Christopher Dodd also took over the Senate Banking Committee in charge of Freddie mac.
This also was the time when the minority Republicans no longer had any say in the matter.
The unrelenting, uncompromising House and Senate set out to show the Electorate how they were going to whip this Country into their idea of order. Let me give you the condition of affairs at exactly that point in time.
George Bush's Economic policies had just set a record of 52 straight months of job growth in Private Industry.
The Dow Jones was at a modest 12.621.77
G.D.P. for the last Quarter was at 3.5 %
Unemployment was at 4.6 %.
After 15 months of Obama and Democratic control, the economic meltdown occurred with the Democrats dumping upwards of 6 trillion dollars into toxic,risky loans to keep the foolish Lenders afloat and threatening the very heart of this country's financial system.
Starting back in 2001, President Bush foresaw the problem starting and warned Congress and the Lending Industry to stop the risky loans. He warned the Democratic controlled Congress 16 more times
before leaving office. Barney Frank blocked his proposal, calling it a "Chicken Little" philosophy.
Congress controlled the money all the while, not President Bush! They also controlled the budget.
Remember who was a member of the Senate at the time these spending bills were passed. Barack Obama. He gave his approval to every one of them, before he became President.
Who fought against reform of Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac during this risky lending spree?
Barack Obama, Chris Dodd and Barney Frank. Who received the 3rd highest pay-off from those crippled Institutions? Barack Obama.
Barack Obama as a Senator, voted for the very deficit he inherited as a President and profited from it as well! What??? And he's trying to pass it off on President Bush?
The Conservative contributors would be well advised to quit conceding that the problem started during the Bush days and start referring to it as the Socialist takeover days. The Socialists don't need any more concessions, friends, they've already granted themselves enough! Just sayin'.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)